Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clean-up: remove 'bare' build and e2e test modality #3218

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2024

Conversation

perdasilva
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of the change:
Removes 'bare' modality for building, deploying, and e2e testing

Motivation for the change:
No one really uses this

Architectural changes:

Testing remarks:

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Bug fixes are accompanied by regression test(s)
  • e2e tests and flake fixes are accompanied evidence of flake testing, e.g. executing the test 100(0) times
  • tech debt/todo is accompanied by issue link(s) in comments in the surrounding code
  • Tests are comprehensible, e.g. Ginkgo DSL is being used appropriately
  • Docs updated or added to /doc
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive
  • Tests marked as [FLAKE] are truly flaky and have an issue
  • Code is properly formatted

@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the cleanup/bare branch 4 times, most recently from b540a47 to dcaf4d9 Compare May 5, 2024 12:58
kevinrizza
kevinrizza previously approved these changes May 6, 2024
@kevinrizza kevinrizza added this pull request to the merge queue May 6, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks May 6, 2024
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
@perdasilva perdasilva merged commit 3669b33 into operator-framework:master May 7, 2024
12 checks passed
@perdasilva perdasilva deleted the cleanup/bare branch May 7, 2024 09:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants