Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 bump all the things #3374

Merged

Conversation

perdasilva
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of the change:

Motivation for the change:

Architectural changes:

Testing remarks:

Reviewer Checklist

  • Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
  • Sufficient unit test coverage
  • Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
  • Bug fixes are accompanied by regression test(s)
  • e2e tests and flake fixes are accompanied evidence of flake testing, e.g. executing the test 100(0) times
  • tech debt/todo is accompanied by issue link(s) in comments in the surrounding code
  • Tests are comprehensible, e.g. Ginkgo DSL is being used appropriately
  • Docs updated or added to /doc
  • Commit messages sensible and descriptive
  • Tests marked as [FLAKE] are truly flaky and have an issue
  • Code is properly formatted

Per Goncalves da Silva added 3 commits August 20, 2024 09:49
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the perdasilva/bump-all-the-things-2 branch from bd4f223 to dbd541f Compare August 20, 2024 14:19
@iamniting
Copy link

Can we pls prioritize this PR we require this to solve the #3375

Signed-off-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Signed-off-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@dtfranz dtfranz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 27, 2024
@dtfranz dtfranz added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 27, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
* update libraries

Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>

* update vendor

Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>

* update generated code

Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>

* fixes

Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>

* Update to generics

Signed-off-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>

* Separate out e2e flakes

Signed-off-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Co-authored-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Aug 27, 2024
@tmshort tmshort added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 27, 2024
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:master with commit c730fbc Aug 27, 2024
12 checks passed
@iamniting
Copy link

Thanks to everyone who worked on this. I appreciate it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants