Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add chainsaw scorecard test support #6676

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

eddycharly
Copy link
Contributor

Description of the change:

Add chainsaw scorecard test support.

Motivation for the change:

Chainsaw is a tool to run operators/controllers tests.
It is similar to kuttl but with a more modern and flexible approach.
It would be nice to add chainsaw scorecard into operator-sdk.

Checklist

If the pull request includes user-facing changes, extra documentation is required:

Signed-off-by: Charles-Edouard Brétéché <charles.edouard@nirmata.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 8, 2024
@eddycharly eddycharly mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2024
2 tasks
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# Build the scorecard-test-chainsaw binary
FROM --platform=$BUILDPLATFORM golang:1.21 as builder
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 Feb 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If Operator-SDK has the intention to begin to support chainsaw, I think you will need to add an e2e test for those as well. see; https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-sdk/blob/master/test/e2e/go/scorecard_test.go

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can work on that later today :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eddycharly

Before working on it, I suggest contacting the SDK maintainers in the operator-SDK-dev slack channel to see if they are willing to add it to the project.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 9, 2024
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jun 8, 2024
@eddycharly
Copy link
Contributor Author

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jun 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants