[Developer Video] Understanding CI check failures #4610
Assignees
Labels
enhancement
End user-perceivable enhancements.
Impact: Medium
Moderate perceived user impact (non-blocking bugs and general improvements).
Work: Medium
The means to find the solution is clear, but it isn't at good-first-issue level yet.
Comments
github-project-automation
bot
moved this to Needs Triage
in [Team] Developer Workflow & Infrastructure - Android
MohitGupta121
added
Impact: Medium
MohitGupta121
moved this from Todo
to In Progress
in [Team] Developer Workflow & Infrastructure - Android
6 tasks
adhiamboperes
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 20, 2023
…& Replace wiki broken links (#5199) <!-- READ ME FIRST: Please fill in the explanation section below and check off every point from the Essential Checklist! --> ## Explanation Fix #5192, #4610 : [Developer Video] Understanding CI check failures & Replace Wiki broken links This PR include developer video that explains how to handle failures in our Continuous Integration (CI) checks in oppia-android. It also includes the replacement of broken links in our Wiki, improving the documentation for a smoother developer experience. <!-- - Explain what your PR does. If this PR fixes an existing bug, please include - "Fixes #bugnum:" in the explanation so that GitHub can auto-close the issue - when this PR is merged. --> ## Essential Checklist <!-- Please tick the relevant boxes by putting an "x" in them. --> - [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of #bugnum: ...".) - [ ] Any changes to [scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets) files have their rationale included in the PR explanation. - [x] The PR follows the [style guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide). - [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android Studio ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)). - [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and is up-to-date with "develop". - [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)).
|
@MohitGupta121, didn't we already complete this? |
|
Yes @adhiamboperes by #5199 |
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In Progress
to Done
in [Team] Developer Workflow & Infrastructure - Android
Rd4dev
pushed a commit
to Rd4dev/oppia-android
that referenced
this issue
Oct 31, 2023
… failures & Replace wiki broken links (oppia#5199) <!-- READ ME FIRST: Please fill in the explanation section below and check off every point from the Essential Checklist! --> ## Explanation Fix oppia#5192, oppia#4610 : [Developer Video] Understanding CI check failures & Replace Wiki broken links This PR include developer video that explains how to handle failures in our Continuous Integration (CI) checks in oppia-android. It also includes the replacement of broken links in our Wiki, improving the documentation for a smoother developer experience. <!-- - Explain what your PR does. If this PR fixes an existing bug, please include - "Fixes #bugnum:" in the explanation so that GitHub can auto-close the issue - when this PR is merged. --> ## Essential Checklist <!-- Please tick the relevant boxes by putting an "x" in them. --> - [x] The PR title and explanation each start with "Fix #bugnum: " (If this PR fixes part of an issue, prefix the title with "Fix part of #bugnum: ...".) - [ ] Any changes to [scripts/assets](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/tree/develop/scripts/assets) files have their rationale included in the PR explanation. - [x] The PR follows the [style guide](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Coding-style-guide). - [x] The PR does not contain any unnecessary code changes from Android Studio ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#undo-unnecessary-changes)). - [x] The PR is made from a branch that's **not** called "develop" and is up-to-date with "develop". - [x] The PR is **assigned** to the appropriate reviewers ([reference](https://github.com/oppia/oppia-android/wiki/Guidance-on-submitting-a-PR#clarification-regarding-assignees-and-reviewers-section)).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We should create a youtube video for
[Developer Video] Understanding CI check failuresso that contributors can easily follow the video for better understanding.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: