-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stale maven-metadata.xml #1043
Comments
The minimum version is the first Guava release with JPMS support by including Automatic-Module-Name in the manifest. Also removed workaround for ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam#1043
Confirmed! Thanks for the fix, it removes an ugly workaround. |
The minimum version is the first Guava release with JPMS support by including Automatic-Module-Name in the manifest. Also removed workaround for ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam#1043
I ran a dependency updates and observe this problem again. It seems to have coincided with your release. The following dependencies exceed the version found at the milestone revision level:
- org.ops4j.pax.exam:pax-exam-container-native [4.13.5 <- 4.13.1]
http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/paxexam/
- org.ops4j.pax.exam:pax-exam-junit4 [4.13.5 <- 4.13.1]
http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/paxexam/
- org.ops4j.pax.exam:pax-exam-link-mvn [4.13.5 <- 4.13.1]
http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/paxexam/ The maven-metadata.xml says the latest is Forwarded to central-support@sonatype.com |
@ben-manes, as there is no public issue tracker anymore please add any response from Sonatype here. |
From: Support central-support@sonatype.com Hello Ben, Thanks for bringing this to our attention, the missing versions have been fixed in maven metadata. Regards, |
It's still broken (https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/ops4j/pax/exam/):
|
Thank you. Unfortunately, the maintainers noticed it is still broken for
their other artifacts (cc'd).
…On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 8:27 AM Support ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello Ben,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention, the missing versions have been
fixed in maven metadata.
Regards,
The Central Team
This email is a service from Central Support by Sonatype. Delivered by
Zendesk
<https://www.zendesk.com/support/?utm_campaign=text&utm_content=Central+Support+by+Sonatype&utm_medium=poweredbyzendesk&utm_source=email-notification>
On December 1, 2024 at 6:42:19 PM UTC, ***@***.*** wrote:
There appears to be a regression of OSSRH-94539 (pax.exam#1043
<#1043>) of stale
metadata being sync'd to Central. Those issues include the previous
investigation which, iirc, were due to a stale backup/restore process.
---
I ran a dependency updates and observe this problem again. It seems to
have coincided with your release.
The following dependencies exceed the version found at the milestone
revision level:
- org.ops4j.pax.exam:pax-exam-container-native [4.13.5 <- 4.13.1]
http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/paxexam/
- org.ops4j.pax.exam:pax-exam-junit4 [4.13.5 <- 4.13.1]
http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/paxexam/
- org.ops4j.pax.exam:pax-exam-link-mvn [4.13.5 <- 4.13.1]
http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/paxexam/
The maven-metadata.xml
<https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/ops4j/pax/exam/pax-exam-container-native/maven-metadata.xml>
says the latest is *4.13.1* and has the timestamp *2018-12-09*. The
recent *4.14.0.0* has no directory timestamp like the above. It seems to
be a regression on Central.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ***@***.***
[7L6KPE-DWVME]
|
@oliverlietz they asked to review the modules with you so I cc'd using the info email address from your git commit. |
Root cause (old sync with outdated OPS4J staging repo) is fixed. |
fwiw, I think that is private to Apache members. Thanks for helping get this resolved. |
@ben-manes, Access to ASF Slack is managed via invitations to prevent spamming. |
On Maven Central, the published maven-metadata.xml lists up to version
4.13.1
and declares it as the latest. However, the repository contains4.13.4
, which the search ui lists as the latest. When using tools that scan for dependency upgrades, this causes incorrect suggestions due to the outdated metadata. Somehow your release process is no longer publishing updates.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: