Unittests for aqua.evaluation/finetuning and handlers(evaluation/common/base)

[mingkang111]

PR contains unittest for aqua.evaluation, aqua.finetuning, evaluation handler, common handler, and base handler.

Coverage

This PR also includes @lu-ohai 's contribution on create evaluation and FT.

[github-actions]

📌 Cov diff with main:

📌 Overall coverage:

[github-actions]

📌 Cov diff with main:

📌 Overall coverage:

[mayoor]

@mingkang111 , could you please reset this file to what is in main? I understand that it is only comments and formatting. But Would like only change to tests folder to the master before we make changes to any code of any kind.

[mingkang111]

Done.

[github-actions]

📌 Cov diff with main:

No lines with coverage information in this diff.

📌 Overall coverage:

[lu-ohai]

Just added the unit tests for create evaluation and fine tuning to this branch.

[github-actions]

📌 Cov diff with main:

No lines with coverage information in this diff.

📌 Overall coverage:

[VipulMascarenhas]

lgtm 👍

[github-actions]

📌 Cov diff with main:

No lines with coverage information in this diff.

📌 Overall coverage:

[github-actions]

📌 Cov diff with main:

No lines with coverage information in this diff.

📌 Overall coverage:

[mingkang111]

As per @VipulMascarenhas request, merging PR #773 for handler test into this PR.

[github-actions]

📌 Cov diff with main:

No lines with coverage information in this diff.

📌 Overall coverage:

[mingkang111]

The failing operation test picking up ray==2.3.0 which is incompatible with pydantic==2.7.0. Based on ray's repo ray-project/ray#37019 (comment) , ray is required to >=2.5 to be compatible with pydantic>=2. Therefore, we can remove the pydantic as test dependency for now and implement the checking by ourselves. Once ray can be installed with > 2.5, we go back to use pydantic again.
cc: @ahosler

[github-actions]

📌 Cov diff with main:

No lines with coverage information in this diff.

📌 Overall coverage: