You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What would you like to be added:
Support for multiple MachinePools. This would be implemented by OCI's InstancePool.
Why is this needed:
Currently, when we create a cluster, worker instances, they are created as individual instances. This means that failures in control plane/worker nodes have to be manually addressed.
We can address the above and make self-managed clusters created by CAPOCI more flexible and more resilient to failures.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@hyder can you please edit the statement 1 and 2, it is possible right now also, and machine pools will not help with it. You can create as many machine deployments you want and set different shapes via custom templates. What it will help is point 3. The bug gives the user impression that we cant run mixed workloads right now which is not true.
What would you like to be added:
Support for multiple MachinePools. This would be implemented by OCI's InstancePool.
Why is this needed:
Currently, when we create a cluster, worker instances, they are created as individual instances. This means that failures in control plane/worker nodes have to be manually addressed.
We can address the above and make self-managed clusters created by CAPOCI more flexible and more resilient to failures.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: