GitHub Community
Support repository categories #4174
Replies: 93 comments 77 replies
-
|
Perhaps more fitting to the GitHub style of organizing non-hierarchical data: labels? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm ideally looking for a way to categorize my repositories, without resorting to something like creating an organization. I feel like your labels approach almost fits into what topics do - labels could only show results for a specific user, but it's not much of what I had in mind. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
hmm 🤔 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes, please. What makes the flat list of repositories extra weird is the possibility to create a rich hierarchy of teams, assign complex roles and permissions to these teams in various repositories, and then still have repositories presented as a flat list without any connection to the teams that have ownership over them. If only repositories could be "owned" by different teams and then presented in the same hierarchical order as the teams they are owned by, that would solve this whole debacle for me. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I agree: I'm currently using GitLab and its possibility to organize repositories is one of its best features. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes, it would be a great improvement of the repos organization if it would be possible to add purpose dependant repos into ad-hoc folders, like in GitLab. GitLab Subgroups |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I agree with this idea. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This would be a nice addition to GitHub. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It would be a great improvement of the repos organization if it would be possible to add purpose dependant repos into ad-hoc folders, like in GitLab. GitLab Subgroups |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
we're considering moving to github from bitbucket but this is major reason we are getting pushback. gitlab, bitbucket both support this. please consider adding. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Most devs at my company regret us moving away from Bitbucket to GH. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I really need this feature, being able to organize projects by "subgroups" or folders, it's essential. GitLab and Bitbucket have had this functionality for a long time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
༼ つ ◕__◕ ༽つ Yes please |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This would be extremely useful, even if it's just 1 level of nesting. I'm surprised this isn't a bigger topic since GitLab has had it for years. READMEs or permission inheritance would be a cherry on top. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm surprised too. This is a huge limitation... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Not gona lie. Just grouping without any additional functionality would be enought |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
what kind of additional functionality are you looking for? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This was in response to the "root" comment, who mentioned
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Is this something that could be done with a 3rd party plugin, or github app, or something similar? Because this issue has been around for a long time, and basically ignored. It seems pretty unlikely it's ever going to be implemented. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Should I close this in favor of that issue? It's a heck of a lot older and has a ton of responses on it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
In my opinion, I don't think so, if the discussion remains open, it will ensure that the matter does not fall into oblivion 😅 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Also, this repository is the official feedback forum |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No - the more issues the better. Maybe something will happen. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I didn't even realize that was posted in a different repository, guess I just overlooked it :p. That's enough incentive for me to keep the issue open. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
ok, so how do I upvote it? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Same! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
If you look @ the original post of this request (#4174 (comment)), you'll see ↑ on its bottom extreme left. That's the upvote. Click & make sure it's highlighted (like when you react, typically 👍, to a post). Congrats, you've upvoted. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I work at a large company with thousands of repositories and not having a good time here. My group alone has over 450 repos and it's basically becoming unmanageable. We migrated from Bitbucket two years ago and miss this feature every. single. day. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Completely true, I feel the same 😅 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Please! This is sorely needed in our organization. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Sorry to disappoint you but... We are at 7 years waiting (looking back at the original thread) so you better consider gitlab |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Here to echo the sentiment everybody else has already expressed. I don't want to create a GitHub organization just to group some of my repositories that happen to be related. I might, just so I can continue to have all my repositories on GitHub. That or have a prefix for the repository names. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I was literally telling people in my organization, why aren't these categorized in GitHub under folders. I just realized that GitHub doesn't have this basic featureset 🤦 +1 on the folder request. Sorry guys Microsoft is buying up companies but not updating anything yet lol. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1 for convenient structure (Folders or something else...). GitLab supports this feature, but I love GitHub |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1 +1 +1+1 +1 +1+1 +1 +1+1 +1 +1+1 +1 +1+1 +1 +1+1 +1 +1+1 +1 +1+1 +1 +1+1 +1 +1 Does anyone know if there is any official statement about that feature or any limitation on GitHub side? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The only limitation is the PMs spending countless hours assigning T-shirt story points on tickets. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It would be so easy to just extend the custom properties to repositories—but I have a feeling, GitHub, for some reason, is vehemently against it. Otherwise, I can't explain their blatant ear-shattering silence about it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1, Gitlab does this perfectly, groups, subgroups, man should freely organize stuff inside an... organization ! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Please consider making this happen, GitHub. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
As much as I want it, too: If they wanted it, they would have already done it by now :/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
and others
-
As my number of repositories continues to grow, I'm seeing that it would be great if there was a way to categorize all of them so I could manage them better.
My initial idea includes either doing something where they're just listed under titled headers, or a folder-like system that I could place repositories inside of.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions