Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

internal/distro/rhel9+8/edge: add sos package #3234

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 30, 2023

Conversation

7flying
Copy link
Member

@7flying 7flying commented Jan 23, 2023

Adds the sos package to the edge commit package set so that users have built-in way to gather system logs and debug info.

This pull request includes:

  • adequate testing for the new functionality or fixed issue
  • adequate documentation informing people about the change such as

@7flying 7flying changed the title internal/distro/rhel9/edge: add sos package [WIP] internal/distro/rhel9/edge: add sos package Jan 23, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@schutzbot schutzbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ This PR introduces changes in at least one manifest (when comparing PR HEAD 4b8b453 with the main merge-base 60e6107). Please review the changes. The changes can be found in the artifacts of the Manifest-diff job [0] as manifests.diff.

[0] https://gitlab.com/redhat/services/products/image-builder/ci/osbuild-composer/-/jobs/3646422042/artifacts/browse

@7flying 7flying changed the title [WIP] internal/distro/rhel9/edge: add sos package [WIP] internal/distro/rhel9+8/edge: add sos package Jan 25, 2023
@7flying 7flying changed the title [WIP] internal/distro/rhel9+8/edge: add sos package internal/distro/rhel9+8/edge: add sos package Jan 25, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@schutzbot schutzbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ This PR introduces changes in at least one manifest (when comparing PR HEAD 7645ab7 with the main merge-base 2e3dd16). Please review the changes. The changes can be found in the artifacts of the Manifest-diff job [0] as manifests.diff.

[0] https://gitlab.com/redhat/services/products/image-builder/ci/osbuild-composer/-/jobs/3659056291/artifacts/browse

Copy link
Collaborator

@schutzbot schutzbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ This PR introduces changes in at least one manifest (when comparing PR HEAD 4c2de14 with the main merge-base 2e3dd16). Please review the changes. The changes can be found in the artifacts of the Manifest-diff job [0] as manifests.diff.

[0] https://gitlab.com/redhat/services/products/image-builder/ci/osbuild-composer/-/jobs/3660891305/artifacts/browse

Copy link
Collaborator

@schutzbot schutzbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ This PR introduces changes in at least one manifest (when comparing PR HEAD b6f142a with the main merge-base fe78607). Please review the changes. The changes can be found in the artifacts of the Manifest-diff job [0] as manifests.diff.

[0] https://gitlab.com/redhat/services/products/image-builder/ci/osbuild-composer/-/jobs/3663875710/artifacts/browse

@7flying
Copy link
Member Author

7flying commented Jan 26, 2023

gen-manifests does not regerenate the manifests for 9.1, I have to wait until it is fixed

@ondrejbudai
Copy link
Member

gen-manifests does not regerenate the manifests for 9.1, I have to wait until it is fixed

@7flying Can you expand on that? I'm not aware of anything being broken at the moment.

@7flying
Copy link
Member Author

7flying commented Jan 26, 2023

gen-manifests does not regerenate the manifests for 9.1, I have to wait until it is fixed

@7flying Can you expand on that? I'm not aware of anything being broken at the moment.

I've talked with @achilleas-k on slack (I think that I'm not allowed to paste the link), it's the last thread on osbuild-edge, there was some issue with the repository configuration

@7flying
Copy link
Member Author

7flying commented Jan 26, 2023

this PR depends on #3247 which fixes the rhel 9.1 manifest generation issue

@7flying
Copy link
Member Author

7flying commented Jan 27, 2023

Updated with the 9.1 manifests that were missing

Copy link
Collaborator

@schutzbot schutzbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ This PR introduces changes in at least one manifest (when comparing PR HEAD 07a4d6b with the main merge-base 6c503e4). Please review the changes. The changes can be found in the artifacts of the Manifest-diff job [0] as manifests.diff.

[0] https://gitlab.com/redhat/services/products/image-builder/ci/osbuild-composer/-/jobs/3670237622/artifacts/browse

Copy link
Collaborator

@schutzbot schutzbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ This PR introduces changes in at least one manifest (when comparing PR HEAD 1d2708f with the main merge-base a8b6fd4). Please review the changes. The changes can be found in the artifacts of the Manifest-diff job [0] as manifests.diff.

[0] https://gitlab.com/redhat/services/products/image-builder/ci/osbuild-composer/-/jobs/3671144033/artifacts/browse

@7flying
Copy link
Member Author

7flying commented Jan 30, 2023

schutzbot tells me that there have been manifest changes but regenerating them all doesn't seem to do anything (??, let's see...). This is a rebase.

Copy link
Collaborator

@schutzbot schutzbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ This PR introduces changes in at least one manifest (when comparing PR HEAD 339a562 with the main merge-base 081cc37). Please review the changes. The changes can be found in the artifacts of the Manifest-diff job [0] as manifests.diff.

[0] https://gitlab.com/redhat/services/products/image-builder/ci/osbuild-composer/-/jobs/3680633372/artifacts/browse

@7flying 7flying force-pushed the edge-sos branch 2 times, most recently from f4c05ea to 72daaad Compare January 30, 2023 11:04
Copy link
Collaborator

@schutzbot schutzbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ This PR introduces changes in at least one manifest (when comparing PR HEAD 72daaad with the main merge-base 1667e6e). Please review the changes. The changes can be found in the artifacts of the Manifest-diff job [0] as manifests.diff.

[0] https://gitlab.com/redhat/services/products/image-builder/ci/osbuild-composer/-/jobs/3681357483/artifacts/browse

Adds the sos package to the edge commit package set so that
users have built-in way to gather system logs and debug info.

Signed-off-by: Irene Diez <idiez@redhat.com>
Similarly to the change made for rhel9, adding the sos package
gives users a built-in way to gather system logs and debug info.

Signed-off-by: Irene Diez <idiez@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Irene Diez <idiez@redhat.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@schutzbot schutzbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ This PR introduces changes in at least one manifest (when comparing PR HEAD 302d521 with the main merge-base 70c61d4). Please review the changes. The changes can be found in the artifacts of the Manifest-diff job [0] as manifests.diff.

[0] https://gitlab.com/redhat/services/products/image-builder/ci/osbuild-composer/-/jobs/3682462160/artifacts/browse

Copy link
Member

@achilleas-k achilleas-k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good!

@achilleas-k achilleas-k merged commit 1dfc82a into osbuild:main Jan 30, 2023
@7flying 7flying deleted the edge-sos branch January 30, 2023 18:49
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants