-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Istio authorization policy #38
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Kubernetes manifest resource, Changes
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- deployments/regional/README.md (1 hunks)
- deployments/regional/main.tf (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- deployments/regional/README.md
Additional comments not posted (1)
deployments/regional/main.tf (1)
276-324
: Ensure the AuthorizationPolicy is correctly defined and aligned with security best practices.The addition of the
kubernetes_manifest.gke_info_go
resource is a significant step towards enhancing the security posture of thegke-info-go
application by explicitly defining access controls. Here are some observations and suggestions:
Resource Definition:
- The
apiVersion
andkind
are correctly specified for an Istio AuthorizationPolicy.- The
metadata
section correctly identifies the resource within the Kubernetes namespace.Policy Specification:
- The
action
field is set to "ALLOW", which is appropriate for defining permissions rather than restrictions.- The
rules
are well-defined, specifying that only GET requests are allowed to specific endpoints. This is a good practice as it limits the potential for abuse by restricting the types of requests that can be made.Source Namespace Restriction:
- The policy restricts the source to the
istio-ingress
namespace. This is a prudent choice as it ensures that only traffic coming through the controlled ingress points is allowed, which enhances security.Path Specificity:
- The paths specified are limited to essential operational endpoints, which minimizes the exposure of sensitive endpoints. This is a good security practice.
Label Selector:
- The
selector
usesmatchLabels
to apply the policy specifically to thegke-info-go
app. This targeted approach helps in minimizing the scope of the policy to relevant resources only.Recommendations:
- Documentation: Ensure that the documentation is updated to reflect these changes and to guide users on how to interact with the new security measures.
- Testing: It would be beneficial to include tests that verify the enforcement of this policy to ensure that it behaves as expected under various scenarios.
Overall, the configuration appears to be well-thought-out and aligns with best practices for Kubernetes security. However, continuous evaluation and adjustment of the policy based on observed traffic and threats are recommended to maintain a robust security posture.
Summary by CodeRabbit
kubernetes_manifest.gke_info_go
resource, providing users with direct access to comprehensive resource information.