Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Istio authorization policy #38

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Aug 31, 2024
Merged

Add Istio authorization policy #38

merged 10 commits into from
Aug 31, 2024

Conversation

brettcurtis
Copy link
Contributor

@brettcurtis brettcurtis commented Aug 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new Kubernetes manifest resource for an AuthorizationPolicy, enhancing security by defining access controls for the application.
    • Added a documentation entry for the kubernetes_manifest.gke_info_go resource, providing users with direct access to comprehensive resource information.

@brettcurtis brettcurtis self-assigned this Aug 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new Kubernetes manifest resource, kubernetes_manifest.gke_info_go, which defines an AuthorizationPolicy for the gke-info-go application. This resource specifies access control rules, including allowed operations and source namespaces. Additionally, the documentation for the resource has been updated to include a reference link, enhancing the overall resource information available to users.

Changes

Files Change Summary
deployments/regional/README.md New entry for kubernetes_manifest.gke_info_go resource documentation link added.
deployments/regional/main.tf New resource declaration for kubernetes_manifest.gke_info_go that specifies an AuthorizationPolicy.

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@brettcurtis brettcurtis temporarily deployed to Sandbox: Regional - us-east1-b August 30, 2024 22:49 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@brettcurtis brettcurtis temporarily deployed to Sandbox: Regional - us-east1-b August 30, 2024 22:59 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@brettcurtis brettcurtis had a problem deploying to Sandbox: Regional - us-east1-b August 30, 2024 23:05 — with GitHub Actions Failure
@brettcurtis brettcurtis temporarily deployed to Sandbox: Regional - us-east1-b August 31, 2024 12:42 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@brettcurtis brettcurtis temporarily deployed to Sandbox: Regional - us-east1-b August 31, 2024 12:46 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@brettcurtis brettcurtis temporarily deployed to Sandbox: Regional - us-east1-b August 31, 2024 12:57 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@brettcurtis brettcurtis temporarily deployed to Sandbox: Regional - us-east1-b August 31, 2024 13:18 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@brettcurtis brettcurtis had a problem deploying to Sandbox: Regional - us-east1-b August 31, 2024 13:29 — with GitHub Actions Failure
@brettcurtis brettcurtis had a problem deploying to Sandbox: Regional - us-east1-b August 31, 2024 13:33 — with GitHub Actions Failure
@brettcurtis brettcurtis temporarily deployed to Sandbox: Regional - us-east1-b August 31, 2024 13:35 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@brettcurtis brettcurtis marked this pull request as ready for review August 31, 2024 13:42
@brettcurtis brettcurtis temporarily deployed to Sandbox: Regional - us-east1-b August 31, 2024 13:43 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26500ed and fc6b0fd.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • deployments/regional/README.md (1 hunks)
  • deployments/regional/main.tf (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • deployments/regional/README.md
Additional comments not posted (1)
deployments/regional/main.tf (1)

276-324: Ensure the AuthorizationPolicy is correctly defined and aligned with security best practices.

The addition of the kubernetes_manifest.gke_info_go resource is a significant step towards enhancing the security posture of the gke-info-go application by explicitly defining access controls. Here are some observations and suggestions:

  1. Resource Definition:

    • The apiVersion and kind are correctly specified for an Istio AuthorizationPolicy.
    • The metadata section correctly identifies the resource within the Kubernetes namespace.
  2. Policy Specification:

    • The action field is set to "ALLOW", which is appropriate for defining permissions rather than restrictions.
    • The rules are well-defined, specifying that only GET requests are allowed to specific endpoints. This is a good practice as it limits the potential for abuse by restricting the types of requests that can be made.
  3. Source Namespace Restriction:

    • The policy restricts the source to the istio-ingress namespace. This is a prudent choice as it ensures that only traffic coming through the controlled ingress points is allowed, which enhances security.
  4. Path Specificity:

    • The paths specified are limited to essential operational endpoints, which minimizes the exposure of sensitive endpoints. This is a good security practice.
  5. Label Selector:

    • The selector uses matchLabels to apply the policy specifically to the gke-info-go app. This targeted approach helps in minimizing the scope of the policy to relevant resources only.

Recommendations:

  • Documentation: Ensure that the documentation is updated to reflect these changes and to guide users on how to interact with the new security measures.
  • Testing: It would be beneficial to include tests that verify the enforcement of this policy to ensure that it behaves as expected under various scenarios.

Overall, the configuration appears to be well-thought-out and aligns with best practices for Kubernetes security. However, continuous evaluation and adjustment of the policy based on observed traffic and threats are recommended to maintain a robust security posture.

@brettcurtis brettcurtis merged commit ebc2d8f into main Aug 31, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@brettcurtis brettcurtis deleted the auth branch August 31, 2024 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant