Add check for name being part of alt_name #2333
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JOSMs validator rules already check if the value of name is equal to alt_name. This rule instead checks if the value of name is part of alt_name when alt_name contains multiple values
Famlam
force-pushed
the
famlam-nameinaltname
branch
from
fcaada7
to
25534e0
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
JOSMs validator rules already check if the value of name is equal to alt_name.
This rule instead checks if the value of name is part of alt_name when alt_name contains multiple values
Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1277853482
name=Paulusbronalt_name=Paulusbron;Op den bornRequires 2330 and 2332 to be merged firstNote: I have no idea how many cases there will be worldwide. I just spotted this one and thought it could be interesting, but feel free to reject if it's too specific.