Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: expect single synthetic lock per native lock ID #5265

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
May 26, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
* [#5187](https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/pull/5187) Expand `IncentivizedPools` query to include internally incentivized CL pools.
* [#5239](https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/pull/5239) Implement `GetTotalPoolShares` public keeper function for GAMM.
* [#5261](https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/pull/5261) Allows `UpdateFeeTokenProposal` to take in multiple fee tokens instead of just one.

* [#5265](https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/pull/5265) Ensure a lock cannot point to multiple synthetic locks. Deprecates `SyntheticLockupsByLockupID` in favor of `SyntheticLockupByLockupID`.

### API breaks

* [#4336](https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/pull/4336) Move epochs module into its own go.mod
Expand Down
22 changes: 20 additions & 2 deletions proto/osmosis/lockup/query.proto
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -88,13 +88,22 @@ service Query {
option (google.api.http).get = "/osmosis/lockup/v1beta1/next_lock_id";
}

// Returns synthetic lockups by native lockup id
// Returns synthetic lockup by native lockup id
// Deprecated: use SyntheticLockupByLockupID instead
rpc SyntheticLockupsByLockupID(SyntheticLockupsByLockupIDRequest)
returns (SyntheticLockupsByLockupIDResponse) {
option deprecated = true;
czarcas7ic marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
option (google.api.http).get =
"/osmosis/lockup/v1beta1/synthetic_lockups_by_lock_id/{lock_id}";
}

// Returns synthetic lockup by native lockup id
rpc SyntheticLockupByLockupID(SyntheticLockupByLockupIDRequest)
returns (SyntheticLockupByLockupIDResponse) {
option (google.api.http).get =
"/osmosis/lockup/v1beta1/synthetic_lockup_by_lock_id/{lock_id}";
}

// Returns account locked records with longer duration
rpc AccountLockedLongerDuration(AccountLockedLongerDurationRequest)
returns (AccountLockedLongerDurationResponse) {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -247,11 +256,20 @@ message LockedResponse { PeriodLock lock = 1; };
message NextLockIDRequest {};
message NextLockIDResponse { uint64 lock_id = 1; };

message SyntheticLockupsByLockupIDRequest { uint64 lock_id = 1; }
message SyntheticLockupsByLockupIDRequest {
option deprecated = true;
uint64 lock_id = 1;
}
message SyntheticLockupsByLockupIDResponse {
option deprecated = true;
repeated SyntheticLock synthetic_locks = 1 [ (gogoproto.nullable) = false ];
}

message SyntheticLockupByLockupIDRequest { uint64 lock_id = 1; }
message SyntheticLockupByLockupIDResponse {
SyntheticLock synthetic_lock = 1 [ (gogoproto.nullable) = false ];
}

message AccountLockedLongerDurationRequest {
string owner = 1 [ (gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"owner\"" ];
google.protobuf.Duration duration = 2 [
Expand Down
12 changes: 11 additions & 1 deletion x/lockup/client/cli/query.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ func GetQueryCmd() *cobra.Command {
GetCmdAccountLockedLongerDurationDenom(),
GetCmdOutputLocksJson(),
GetCmdSyntheticLockupsByLockupID(),
GetCmdSyntheticLockupByLockupID(),
GetCmdAccountLockedDuration(),
GetCmdNextLockID(),
osmocli.GetParams[*types.QueryParamsRequest](
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -200,10 +201,19 @@ func GetCmdNextLockID() *cobra.Command {
}

// GetCmdSyntheticLockupsByLockupID returns synthetic lockups by lockup id.
// nolint: staticcheck
func GetCmdSyntheticLockupsByLockupID() *cobra.Command {
return osmocli.SimpleQueryCmd[*types.SyntheticLockupsByLockupIDRequest](
"synthetic-lockups-by-lock-id <id>",
"Query synthetic lockups by lockup id",
"Query synthetic lockups by lockup id (is deprecated for synthetic-lockup-by-lock-id)",
`{{.Short}}`, types.ModuleName, types.NewQueryClient)
}

// GetCmdSyntheticLockupByLockupID returns synthetic lockup by lockup id.
func GetCmdSyntheticLockupByLockupID() *cobra.Command {
return osmocli.SimpleQueryCmd[*types.SyntheticLockupByLockupIDRequest](
"synthetic-lockup-by-lock-id <id>",
"Query synthetic lock by underlying lockup id",
`{{.Short}}`, types.ModuleName, types.NewQueryClient)
}

Expand Down
23 changes: 21 additions & 2 deletions x/lockup/keeper/grpc_query.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -178,14 +178,33 @@ func (q Querier) NextLockID(goCtx context.Context, req *types.NextLockIDRequest)
}

// SyntheticLockupsByLockupID returns synthetic lockups by native lockup id.
// Deprecated: use SyntheticLockupByLockupID instead.
// nolint: staticcheck
func (q Querier) SyntheticLockupsByLockupID(goCtx context.Context, req *types.SyntheticLockupsByLockupIDRequest) (*types.SyntheticLockupsByLockupIDResponse, error) {
if req == nil {
return nil, status.Error(codes.InvalidArgument, "empty request")
}

ctx := sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(goCtx)
synthLocks := q.Keeper.GetAllSyntheticLockupsByLockup(ctx, req.LockId)
return &types.SyntheticLockupsByLockupIDResponse{SyntheticLocks: synthLocks}, nil
synthLock, err := q.Keeper.GetSyntheticLockupByUnderlyingLockId(ctx, req.LockId)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return &types.SyntheticLockupsByLockupIDResponse{SyntheticLocks: []types.SyntheticLock{synthLock}}, nil
}

// SyntheticLockupByLockupID returns synthetic lockup by native lockup id.
func (q Querier) SyntheticLockupByLockupID(goCtx context.Context, req *types.SyntheticLockupByLockupIDRequest) (*types.SyntheticLockupByLockupIDResponse, error) {
if req == nil {
return nil, status.Error(codes.InvalidArgument, "empty request")
}

ctx := sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(goCtx)
synthLock, err := q.Keeper.GetSyntheticLockupByUnderlyingLockId(ctx, req.LockId)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return &types.SyntheticLockupByLockupIDResponse{SyntheticLock: synthLock}, nil
}

// AccountLockedLongerDuration returns locks of an account with duration longer than specified.
Expand Down
26 changes: 17 additions & 9 deletions x/lockup/keeper/lock.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -105,9 +105,11 @@ func (k Keeper) AddTokensToLockByID(ctx sdk.Context, lockID uint64, owner sdk.Ac
return nil, err
}

for _, synthlock := range k.GetAllSyntheticLockupsByLockup(ctx, lock.ID) {
k.accumulationStore(ctx, synthlock.SynthDenom).Increase(accumulationKey(synthlock.Duration), tokensToAdd.Amount)
synthlock, err := k.GetSyntheticLockupByUnderlyingLockId(ctx, lock.ID)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
k.accumulationStore(ctx, synthlock.SynthDenom).Increase(accumulationKey(synthlock.Duration), tokensToAdd.Amount)

if k.hooks == nil {
return lock, nil
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -375,15 +377,20 @@ func (k Keeper) PartialForceUnlock(ctx sdk.Context, lock types.PeriodLock, coins
// ForceUnlock ignores unlock duration and immediately unlocks the lock and refunds tokens to lock owner.
func (k Keeper) ForceUnlock(ctx sdk.Context, lock types.PeriodLock) error {
// Steps:
// 1) Break associated synthetic locks. (Superfluid data)
// 1) Break associated synthetic lock. (Superfluid data)
// 2) If lock is bonded, move it to unlocking
// 3) Run logic to delete unlocking metadata, and send tokens to owner.

synthLocks := k.GetAllSyntheticLockupsByLockup(ctx, lock.ID)
err := k.DeleteAllSyntheticLocks(ctx, lock, synthLocks)
synthLock, err := k.GetSyntheticLockupByUnderlyingLockId(ctx, lock.ID)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if !synthLock.IsNil() {
err = k.DeleteSyntheticLockup(ctx, lock.ID, synthLock.SynthDenom)
if err != nil {
return err
}
}

if !lock.IsUnlocking() {
_, err := k.BeginUnlock(ctx, lock.ID, nil)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -727,13 +734,14 @@ func (k Keeper) removeTokensFromLock(ctx sdk.Context, lock *types.PeriodLock, co
}

// increase synthetic lockup's accumulation store
synthLocks := k.GetAllSyntheticLockupsByLockup(ctx, lock.ID)
synthLock, err := k.GetSyntheticLockupByUnderlyingLockId(ctx, lock.ID)
if err != nil {
return err
}

// Note: since synthetic lockup deletion is using native lockup's coins to reduce accumulation store
// all the synthetic lockups' accumulation should be decreased
for _, synthlock := range synthLocks {
k.accumulationStore(ctx, synthlock.SynthDenom).Decrease(accumulationKey(synthlock.Duration), coins[0].Amount)
}
k.accumulationStore(ctx, synthLock.SynthDenom).Decrease(accumulationKey(synthLock.Duration), coins[0].Amount)
return nil
}

Expand Down
17 changes: 10 additions & 7 deletions x/lockup/keeper/lock_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ import (
cl "github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v15/x/concentrated-liquidity"
cltypes "github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v15/x/concentrated-liquidity/types"
"github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v15/x/lockup/types"
lockuptypes "github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v15/x/lockup/types"

sdk "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types"
)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -852,11 +853,12 @@ func (s *KeeperTestSuite) AddTokensToLockForSynth() {
for i, synthlock := range s.App.LockupKeeper.GetAllSyntheticLockups(s.Ctx) {
s.Require().Equal(synthlock, synthlocks[i])
}
// by GetAllSyntheticLockupsByLockup
// by GetSyntheticLockupByUnderlyingLockId
for i := uint64(1); i <= 3; i++ {
for j, synthlockByLockup := range s.App.LockupKeeper.GetAllSyntheticLockupsByLockup(s.Ctx, i) {
s.Require().Equal(synthlockByLockup, synthlocks[(int(i)-1)*3+j])
}
synthlockByLockup, err := s.App.LockupKeeper.GetSyntheticLockupByUnderlyingLockId(s.Ctx, i)
s.Require().NoError(err)
s.Require().Equal(synthlockByLockup, synthlocks[(int(i)-1)*3+int(i)])

}
// by GetAllSyntheticLockupsByAddr
for i, synthlock := range s.App.LockupKeeper.GetAllSyntheticLockupsByAddr(s.Ctx, addr1) {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1313,9 +1315,10 @@ func (s *KeeperTestSuite) TestForceUnlock() {
s.Require().Equal(balances, coinsToLock)

// if it was superfluid delegated lock,
// confirm that we don't have associated synth locks
synthLocks := s.App.LockupKeeper.GetAllSyntheticLockupsByLockup(s.Ctx, lock.ID)
s.Require().Equal(0, len(synthLocks))
// confirm that we don't have associated synth lock
synthLock, err := s.App.LockupKeeper.GetSyntheticLockupByUnderlyingLockId(s.Ctx, lock.ID)
s.Require().NoError(err)
s.Require().Equal((lockuptypes.SyntheticLock{}), synthLock)

// check if lock is deleted by checking trying to get lock ID
_, err = s.App.LockupKeeper.GetLockByID(s.Ctx, lock.ID)
Expand Down
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions x/lockup/keeper/msg_server.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -208,8 +208,11 @@ func (server msgServer) ForceUnlock(goCtx context.Context, msg *types.MsgForceUn
}

// check that given lock is not superfluid staked
synthLocks := server.keeper.GetAllSyntheticLockupsByLockup(ctx, lock.ID)
if len(synthLocks) > 0 {
synthLock, err := server.keeper.GetSyntheticLockupByUnderlyingLockId(ctx, lock.ID)
if err != nil {
return &types.MsgForceUnlockResponse{Success: false}, errorsmod.Wrap(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, err.Error())
}
if !synthLock.IsNil() {
return &types.MsgForceUnlockResponse{Success: false}, errorsmod.Wrap(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "superfluid delegation exists for lock")
}

Expand Down
46 changes: 23 additions & 23 deletions x/lockup/keeper/synthetic_lock.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -36,8 +36,10 @@ func (k Keeper) GetSyntheticLockup(ctx sdk.Context, lockID uint64, synthdenom st
return &synthLock, err
}

// GetAllSyntheticLockupsByLockup gets all the synthetic lockup object of the original lockup.
func (k Keeper) GetAllSyntheticLockupsByLockup(ctx sdk.Context, lockID uint64) []types.SyntheticLock {
// Error is returned if:
// - there are more than one synthetic lockup objects with the same underlying lock ID.
// - there is no synthetic lockup object with the given underlying lock ID.
func (k Keeper) GetSyntheticLockupByUnderlyingLockId(ctx sdk.Context, lockID uint64) (types.SyntheticLock, error) {
store := ctx.KVStore(k.storeKey)
iterator := sdk.KVStorePrefixIterator(store, combineKeys(types.KeyPrefixSyntheticLockup, sdk.Uint64ToBigEndian(lockID)))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we are directly using key -value pair I think we should implement this without using iterators

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed iterator here e0ecfea

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After looking into this, I don't think we can do this without a large refactor / state migration. We are currently keying by lockID and synthDenom, which is why we need to use the iterator. We absolutely do not need the synthDenom in the key, but if we removed it, we would need to do a state migration of all currently existing state entires.

I am going to revert back to the iterator method, but will wait for an ack on this before merging @mattverse

defer iterator.Close()
Expand All @@ -47,19 +49,29 @@ func (k Keeper) GetAllSyntheticLockupsByLockup(ctx sdk.Context, lockID uint64) [
synthLock := types.SyntheticLock{}
err := proto.Unmarshal(iterator.Value(), &synthLock)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
return types.SyntheticLock{}, err
}
synthLocks = append(synthLocks, synthLock)
}
return synthLocks
if len(synthLocks) > 1 {
return types.SyntheticLock{}, fmt.Errorf("synthetic lockup with same lock id should not exist")
}
if len(synthLocks) == 0 {
return types.SyntheticLock{}, nil
}
return synthLocks[0], nil
}

// GetAllSyntheticLockupsByAddr gets all the synthetic lockups from all the locks owned by the given address.
func (k Keeper) GetAllSyntheticLockupsByAddr(ctx sdk.Context, owner sdk.AccAddress) []types.SyntheticLock {
synthLocks := []types.SyntheticLock{}
locks := k.GetAccountPeriodLocks(ctx, owner)
for _, lock := range locks {
synthLocks = append(synthLocks, k.GetAllSyntheticLockupsByLockup(ctx, lock.ID)...)
synthLock, err := k.GetSyntheticLockupByUnderlyingLockId(ctx, lock.ID)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
synthLocks = append(synthLocks, synthLock)
}
return synthLocks
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -96,8 +108,11 @@ func (k Keeper) CreateSyntheticLockup(ctx sdk.Context, lockID uint64, synthDenom
// There is no relationship between unbonding and bonding synthetic lockup, it's managed separately
// A separate accumulation store is incremented with the synth denom.

_, err := k.GetSyntheticLockup(ctx, lockID, synthDenom)
if err == nil {
synthLock, err := k.GetSyntheticLockupByUnderlyingLockId(ctx, lockID)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if !synthLock.IsNil() {
return types.ErrSyntheticLockupAlreadyExists
}

Expand All @@ -115,7 +130,7 @@ func (k Keeper) CreateSyntheticLockup(ctx sdk.Context, lockID uint64, synthDenom
}

// set synthetic lockup object
synthLock := types.SyntheticLock{
synthLock = types.SyntheticLock{
UnderlyingLockId: lockID,
SynthDenom: synthDenom,
EndTime: endTime,
Expand All @@ -141,21 +156,6 @@ func (k Keeper) CreateSyntheticLockup(ctx sdk.Context, lockID uint64, synthDenom
return nil
}

// DeleteAllSyntheticLocks iterates over given array of synthetic locks and deletes all individual synthetic locks.
func (k Keeper) DeleteAllSyntheticLocks(ctx sdk.Context, lock types.PeriodLock, synthLocks []types.SyntheticLock) error {
if len(synthLocks) == 0 {
return nil
}

for _, synthLock := range synthLocks {
err := k.DeleteSyntheticLockup(ctx, lock.ID, synthLock.SynthDenom)
if err != nil {
return err
}
}
return nil
}
Comment on lines -144 to -157
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No longer needed. We use DeleteSyntheticLockup directly now since we never expect multiple synthLocks anymore


// DeleteSyntheticLockup delete synthetic lockup with lock id and synthdenom.
// Synthetic lock has three relevant state entries.
// - synthetic lock object itself
Expand Down
Loading