Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update clay_lump.lua #3802

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2021
Merged

Update clay_lump.lua #3802

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2021

Conversation

EPuncker
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request Prelude

Changes Proposed

linter said it has nil value
so It seems oke to declare the variable in the loop instead

by @idontreallywolf

Issues addressed:

linter said it has nil value
so It seems oke to declare the variable in the loop instead
Copy link
Contributor

@MillhioreBT MillhioreBT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is the true lua style ;)

@DSpeichert DSpeichert merged commit 9a8e6af into master Dec 14, 2021
@DSpeichert DSpeichert deleted the EPuncker-patch-4 branch December 14, 2021 23:26
Znote pushed a commit to Znote/forgottenserver that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2022
linter said it has nil value
so It seems oke to declare the variable in the loop instead
DSpeichert pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
linter said it has nil value
so It seems oke to declare the variable in the loop instead
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants