feat: task: add resolver_usernames to POST /task #306
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Alkorin
reviewed
Dec 24, 2021
Alkorin
reviewed
Dec 24, 2021
Signed-off-by: Romain Beuque <556072+rbeuque74@users.noreply.github.com>
rbeuque74
force-pushed
the
create-task-resolver-usernames
branch
from
6c32745 to
e637fa3
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Feature
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Adding
resolver_usernamesas input forPOST /taskto allow admins and template owners to add more resolvers to a task.This allow to give control to more users over a task. Usefull in case the task is created by an automated process, and we want to let users control over the task execution.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
No
Other information: