Added a shipping readme that contains information about packaging #11937
Conversation
This is hopefully useful information for downstream packagers.
|
This true for the upcoming and subsequent releases an should be noted as such. |
PACKAGING.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| Here are some hints for packager of the linux distributions which we kindly ask to change their packages in the distros to help us providing the best ownCloud client integration experience: | ||
|
|
||
| The shell integrations are available for KDE Dolphin [1], Nautilus and Caja [1]. While KDE Dolphin needs compiled code, the latter two are using python. [ADD LINKS]. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dragotin which links are you expecting here? can you add them or at least point me in some direction? THX 😍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have pushed a commit that adds the links to the source repos of the discussed extensions. I hope that is sufficient.
what is you expectation? @mmattel to me it is valid on the branch(es) where this file is contained to state the current status. |
as discussed in online, just add a remark that this is available with +6.0 |
|
|
||
| ## Integration Problems | ||
|
|
||
| The ownCloud desktop client gets shipped as AppImage because it is effortless to create, independent from the underlying distro and easy to install, as long as the distribution is not providing a package on their own which is frequently updated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| The ownCloud desktop client gets shipped as AppImage because it is effortless to create, independent from the underlying distro and easy to install, as long as the distribution is not providing a package on their own which is frequently updated. | |
| The ownCloud Desktop App gets shipped as AppImage because it is effortless to create, independent from the underlying distro and easy to install, as long as the distribution is not providing a package on their own which is frequently updated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Where is this coming from? We ever since name it 'ownCloud Desktop Client' ... 😕
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Where is this coming from? We ever since name it 'ownCloud Desktop Client' ... 😕
This was decided about +2y ago by mstingl. Consequently I named this is all docs + versions. We now have this harmonized naming for the Desktop App, iOS App and Android App.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well but here we are in the client repo and talk about dev facing documentation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's about consistency which is independent of where we are. just my 2c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is indeed named that way on the web page as well .... https://owncloud.com/desktop-app/
THX
There was a problem hiding this comment.
... but is anybody talking about apps in the context of desktop? 😕
|
@DeepDiver1975 I have added some suggestable commits and named the SW correctly: |
Co-authored-by: Martin <github@diemattels.at>
This is hopefully useful information for downstream packagers.