Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(transformer/arrow-function): reserve correct capacity for Vec #7319

Conversation

overlookmotel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Nov 16, 2024

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into main

Add the label “0-merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix.

You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

@overlookmotel overlookmotel marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2024 23:51
@github-actions github-actions bot added A-transformer Area - Transformer / Transpiler C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior labels Nov 17, 2024
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 17, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #7319 will not alter performance

Comparing 11-16-refactor_transformer_arrow-function_reserve_correct_capacity_for_vec_ (ea08c1f) with 11-16-perf_transformer_arrow-function_super_method_binding_names_lazily (e09d2df)

Summary

✅ 30 untouched benchmarks

Copy link
Member

Dunqing commented Nov 17, 2024

Merge activity

@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 11-16-perf_transformer_arrow-function_super_method_binding_names_lazily branch from 94b20ba to f1cd977 Compare November 17, 2024 05:11
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 11-16-refactor_transformer_arrow-function_reserve_correct_capacity_for_vec_ branch from 57a3518 to b9fcc58 Compare November 17, 2024 05:11
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Nov 17, 2024
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 11-16-perf_transformer_arrow-function_super_method_binding_names_lazily branch from f1cd977 to 1821352 Compare November 17, 2024 10:01
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 11-16-refactor_transformer_arrow-function_reserve_correct_capacity_for_vec_ branch from b9fcc58 to ed2e515 Compare November 17, 2024 10:01
@graphite-app graphite-app bot added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Nov 17, 2024
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 11-16-perf_transformer_arrow-function_super_method_binding_names_lazily branch from 1821352 to e09d2df Compare November 17, 2024 10:10
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 11-16-refactor_transformer_arrow-function_reserve_correct_capacity_for_vec_ branch from ed2e515 to ea08c1f Compare November 17, 2024 10:10
Base automatically changed from 11-16-perf_transformer_arrow-function_super_method_binding_names_lazily to main November 17, 2024 10:42
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit ea08c1f into main Nov 17, 2024
29 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 11-16-refactor_transformer_arrow-function_reserve_correct_capacity_for_vec_ branch November 17, 2024 10:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue A-transformer Area - Transformer / Transpiler C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants