Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Deal with implicit numbering #46

Closed
nforro opened this issue Apr 7, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #48
Closed

Deal with implicit numbering #46

nforro opened this issue Apr 7, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #48
Assignees
@nforro

Comments

@nforro
Copy link
Member

nforro commented Apr 7, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Sources don't have to be numbered, for example this is perfectly valid:

Source:         %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Patch:          applicable.patch
Patch:          conflicting.patch
Patch:          backported.patch
Patch:          renamed-%{version}.patch

and it is equivalent to:

Source0:         %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Patch0:          applicable.patch
Patch1:          conflicting.patch
Patch2:          backported.patch
Patch3:          renamed-%{version}.patch
@nforro nforro self-assigned this Apr 7, 2022
@nforro nforro changed the title Deal with implicit indexing Deal with implicit numbering Apr 8, 2022
@nforro nforro mentioned this issue Apr 8, 2022
Merged
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 26, 2022
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Merge pull request #48 from packit/nforro-implicit-numbering
727564c 
Handle implicit numbering of sources

Fixes #46.

Reviewed-by: František Nečas <None>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nforro nforro

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Handle implicit numbering of sources packit/specfile
1 participant
@nforro