Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#IOCOM-370] Require secure channel flag message #338

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 4, 2023

Conversation

acuiuli
Copy link
Contributor

@acuiuli acuiuli commented Oct 3, 2023

List of Changes

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Chore (nothing changes by a user perspective)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@acuiuli acuiuli requested a review from a team as a code owner October 3, 2023 15:31
@acuiuli acuiuli requested review from gunzip and drmarro October 3, 2023 15:31
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2023

Jira Pull Request Link

This Pull Request refers to the following Jira issue IOCOM-370

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 3, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@acuiuli acuiuli merged commit 8913813 into master Oct 4, 2023
4 checks passed
@acuiuli acuiuli deleted the require-secure-channel-flag-message branch October 4, 2023 08:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants