Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[#IOCOM-729] Fixed property case #353

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2023
Merged

[#IOCOM-729] Fixed property case #353

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2023

Conversation

michaeldisaro
Copy link
Contributor

List of Changes

Fixed case for some properties to make it coherent

Motivation and Context

We need coherent code

How Has This Been Tested?

unit tests

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Chore (nothing changes by a user perspective)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@michaeldisaro michaeldisaro requested a review from a team as a code owner December 12, 2023 17:45
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Jira Pull Request Link

This Pull Request refers to the following Jira issue IOCOM-729

@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@michaeldisaro michaeldisaro merged commit 5428d6b into master Dec 12, 2023
5 checks passed
@michaeldisaro michaeldisaro deleted the iocom-729-b branch December 12, 2023 17:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Garma00 Garma00 Garma00 approved these changes

@Krusty93 Krusty93 Awaiting requested review from Krusty93 Krusty93 is a code owner automatically assigned from pagopa/io-backend-contributors

@gquadrati gquadrati Awaiting requested review from gquadrati gquadrati is a code owner automatically assigned from pagopa/io-backend-contributors

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@michaeldisaro @Garma00