Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#IOCOM-1047] fix remote content configuration definitions #366

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2024

Conversation

acuiuli
Copy link
Contributor

@acuiuli acuiuli commented Feb 13, 2024

List of Changes

Motivation and Context

Added new remote content configuration model to manage request and response

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Chore (nothing changes by a user perspective)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@acuiuli acuiuli requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2024 09:35
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 13, 2024

Jira Pull Request Link

This Pull Request refers to the following Jira issue IOCOM-1047

@acuiuli acuiuli changed the title fix remote content configuration definitions [#IOCOM-1047] fix remote content configuration definitions Feb 13, 2024
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@acuiuli acuiuli merged commit 974b76d into master Feb 13, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@acuiuli acuiuli deleted the IOCOM-1047 branch February 13, 2024 09:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants