Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: [PAGOPA-2359] - serviceType field #29

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alessio-acitelli
Copy link

@alessio-acitelli alessio-acitelli commented Nov 27, 2024

List of Changes

  • refactored code for new serviceType field

Motivation and Context

  • introduced new field to identify debt positions

How Has This Been Tested?

  • manual and junit test

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

aacitelli added 2 commits November 27, 2024 17:06
https://github.com/pagopa/pagopa-gpd-payments-pull into
PAGOPA-2359-exclude-WISP

Conflicts:
	src/main/java/it/gov/pagopa/gpd/payments/pull/repository/PaymentPositionRepository.java
aacitelli added 2 commits November 27, 2024 17:32
https://github.com/pagopa/pagopa-gpd-payments-pull into
PAGOPA-2359-exclude-WISP

Conflicts:
	src/main/java/it/gov/pagopa/gpd/payments/pull/repository/PaymentPositionRepository.java
Copy link

@cap-ang cap-ang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good work, just some doubts.
With this change (if I am not mistaken) we avoid showing WISP debt positions and it is correct

Could we test at least in DEV environment before merge it?

@alessio-acitelli
Copy link
Author

Good work, just some doubts. With this change (if I am not mistaken) we avoid showing WISP debt positions and it is correct

Could we test at least in DEV environment before merge it?

I did some tests locally but no problem deploying in DEV. Before doing so, I would say to wait until the alignment task of the previous PAGOPA-2427 has been done

Copy link
Contributor

@jacopocarlini jacopocarlini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good work! 👍

@pasqualespica pasqualespica changed the title feat: [PAGOPA-2359] - serviceType field feat: [PAGOPA-2359] - migration serviceType field Dec 6, 2024
@pasqualespica pasqualespica changed the title feat: [PAGOPA-2359] - migration serviceType field feat: [PAGOPA-2359] - serviceType field Dec 6, 2024
@pasqualespica pasqualespica added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation dev labels Dec 6, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2024

This pull request does not contain a valid label. Please add one of the following labels: [major, minor, patch, patch, skip]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dev documentation Improvements or additions to documentation size/small uat
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants