Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Enabling experimental features on pack #88

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2024
Merged

Enabling experimental features on pack #88

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

pacostas
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This PR enables experimental features on pack.

Related issue

Use Cases

Checklist

  • I have viewed, signed, and submitted the Contributor License Agreement.
  • I have linked issue(s) that this PR should close using keywords or the Github UI (See docs)
  • I have added an integration test, if necessary.
  • I have reviewed the styleguide for guidance on my code quality.
  • I'm happy with the commit history on this PR (I have rebased/squashed as needed).

@pacostas pacostas requested a review from a team as a code owner March 22, 2024 08:55
@pacostas
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mhdawson I added the options.json file.

@pacostas pacostas mentioned this pull request Mar 22, 2024
Open
mhdawson
mhdawson approved these changes Mar 22, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mhdawson mhdawson merged commit 9d24b33 into paketo-community:main Mar 22, 2024
2 checks passed
@pacostas pacostas deleted the options-json branch March 23, 2024 13:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mhdawson mhdawson mhdawson approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@pacostas @mhdawson