-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BUG: Series.combine() fails with ExtensionArray inside of Series #21183
Changes from all commits
7469ca9
bbb6640
339b23a
61a09e7
d862e83
4c925fc
27480ac
f96372e
677fe18
9fceee7
1010cb5
aceea9f
79506ac
0e4720b
2a21117
e08f832
d3ed2c7
4ca28b2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2204,7 +2204,7 @@ def _binop(self, other, func, level=None, fill_value=None): | |
result.name = None | ||
return result | ||
|
||
def combine(self, other, func, fill_value=np.nan): | ||
def combine(self, other, func, fill_value=None): | ||
""" | ||
Perform elementwise binary operation on two Series using given function | ||
with optional fill value when an index is missing from one Series or | ||
|
@@ -2216,6 +2216,8 @@ def combine(self, other, func, fill_value=np.nan): | |
func : function | ||
Function that takes two scalars as inputs and return a scalar | ||
fill_value : scalar value | ||
The default specifies to use the appropriate NaN value for | ||
the underlying dtype of the Series | ||
|
||
Returns | ||
------- | ||
|
@@ -2235,20 +2237,38 @@ def combine(self, other, func, fill_value=np.nan): | |
Series.combine_first : Combine Series values, choosing the calling | ||
Series's values first | ||
""" | ||
if fill_value is None: | ||
fill_value = na_value_for_dtype(self.dtype, compat=False) | ||
|
||
if isinstance(other, Series): | ||
# If other is a Series, result is based on union of Series, | ||
# so do this element by element | ||
new_index = self.index.union(other.index) | ||
new_name = ops.get_op_result_name(self, other) | ||
new_values = np.empty(len(new_index), dtype=self.dtype) | ||
for i, idx in enumerate(new_index): | ||
new_values = [] | ||
for idx in new_index: | ||
lv = self.get(idx, fill_value) | ||
rv = other.get(idx, fill_value) | ||
with np.errstate(all='ignore'): | ||
new_values[i] = func(lv, rv) | ||
new_values.append(func(lv, rv)) | ||
else: | ||
# Assume that other is a scalar, so apply the function for | ||
# each element in the Series | ||
new_index = self.index | ||
with np.errstate(all='ignore'): | ||
new_values = func(self._values, other) | ||
new_values = [func(lv, other) for lv in self._values] | ||
new_name = self.name | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. can you put a comment on what is going on here There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. done |
||
if is_categorical_dtype(self.values): | ||
pass | ||
elif is_extension_array_dtype(self.values): | ||
# The function can return something of any type, so check | ||
# if the type is compatible with the calling EA | ||
try: | ||
new_values = self._values._from_sequence(new_values) | ||
except TypeError: | ||
pass | ||
|
||
return self._constructor(new_values, index=new_index, name=new_name) | ||
|
||
def combine_first(self, other): | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -103,3 +103,37 @@ def test_factorize_equivalence(self, data_for_grouping, na_sentinel): | |
|
||
tm.assert_numpy_array_equal(l1, l2) | ||
self.assert_extension_array_equal(u1, u2) | ||
|
||
def test_combine_le(self, data_repeated): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. can you give a 1-liner explaining what this is testing. the name of the test is uninformative. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. done |
||
# GH 20825 | ||
# Test that combine works when doing a <= (le) comparison | ||
orig_data1, orig_data2 = data_repeated(2) | ||
s1 = pd.Series(orig_data1) | ||
s2 = pd.Series(orig_data2) | ||
result = s1.combine(s2, lambda x1, x2: x1 <= x2) | ||
expected = pd.Series([a <= b for (a, b) in | ||
zip(list(orig_data1), list(orig_data2))]) | ||
self.assert_series_equal(result, expected) | ||
|
||
val = s1.iloc[0] | ||
result = s1.combine(val, lambda x1, x2: x1 <= x2) | ||
expected = pd.Series([a <= val for a in list(orig_data1)]) | ||
self.assert_series_equal(result, expected) | ||
|
||
def test_combine_add(self, data_repeated): | ||
# GH 20825 | ||
orig_data1, orig_data2 = data_repeated(2) | ||
s1 = pd.Series(orig_data1) | ||
s2 = pd.Series(orig_data2) | ||
result = s1.combine(s2, lambda x1, x2: x1 + x2) | ||
expected = pd.Series( | ||
orig_data1._from_sequence([a + b for (a, b) in | ||
zip(list(orig_data1), | ||
list(orig_data2))])) | ||
self.assert_series_equal(result, expected) | ||
|
||
val = s1.iloc[0] | ||
result = s1.combine(val, lambda x1, x2: x1 + x2) | ||
expected = pd.Series( | ||
orig_data1._from_sequence([a + val for a in list(orig_data1)])) | ||
self.assert_series_equal(result, expected) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does this need a versionchanged?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There should be no change in behaviour for normal Series I think, as the
na_value_for_dtype
will give NaN/NaT (which was the default before). It's only for extension arrays that it might give another value, depending on what the extension array defined its missing value to be.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with @jorisvandenbossche