Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

~Finish collecting m8[ns] tests, start collecting division by zero tests #22153

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Aug 7, 2018

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

The division by zero tests aren't yet parametrized, are mostly just moved as-is. Both these and the newly moved m8[ns] tests will need a bunch of de-duplication in the next pass.

Tons of DataFrame tests failing. #22074 is the PR we need, though maybe not the one we deserve.

Started in on fixtures.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Aug 1, 2018

k, rebase on top as merged #22074

@jreback jreback added Testing pandas testing functions or related to the test suite Datetime Datetime data dtype Timedelta Timedelta data type and removed Datetime Datetime data dtype labels Aug 1, 2018
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #22153 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #22153      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.06%   92.06%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         169      169              
  Lines       50694    50694              
==========================================
+ Hits        46671    46672       +1     
+ Misses       4023     4022       -1
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.47% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#single 42.32% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/core/indexes/base.py 96.43% <0%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update def50e2...29c9738. Read the comment docs.

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

jbrockmendel commented Aug 1, 2018

One build is failing because it says there is no "box" fixture, but there is. Seen this before?
update never mind, dumb mistake on my part.

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member Author

@jreback this should go before others for easiest rebasing

@jreback jreback added this to the 0.24.0 milestone Aug 7, 2018
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Aug 7, 2018

ok lgtm. can you rebase and merge on green (just to make sure). can you make the next followup to split this to a sub-dir (i know its all td atm but just to make it clear / easier)

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel merged commit 737b329 into pandas-dev:master Aug 7, 2018
@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the arith_tests4 branch August 7, 2018 18:00
Sup3rGeo pushed a commit to Sup3rGeo/pandas that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2018
…sts (pandas-dev#22153)

* implement box fixture, move a couple tests from timedelta.test_arithmetic, parametrize more

* port floordiv tests

* port test_td64arr_rfloordiv_tdlike_scalar

* make fixtures, port last of TimedeltaIndex div/mul tests

* port add/sub tests, cleanup imports

* port test_tdi_add_offset-index

* port offset addsub tests

* start collecting division by zero tests

* dummy commit to force CI

* fix dumb name override mistake
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Testing pandas testing functions or related to the test suite Timedelta Timedelta data type
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants