-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CategoricalAccessor.categorical removed in 0.24.0rc1 #24751 #24754
CategoricalAccessor.categorical removed in 0.24.0rc1 #24751 #24754
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see my comments on the issue.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #24754 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 92.38% 42.91% -49.47%
===========================================
Files 166 166
Lines 52363 52370 +7
===========================================
- Hits 48376 22476 -25900
- Misses 3987 29894 +25907
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #24754 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.38% 92.38% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 166 166
Lines 52366 52375 +9
==========================================
+ Hits 48380 48389 +9
Misses 3986 3986
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Given @jreback's suggestion that this is unnecessary, I will close this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
May need to find places where we use .cat.name
or .cat.index
internally (if any).
You'll also need to update uses of |
…oricalAccessor-categorical-name-index
Hello @benjaminr! Thanks for updating the PR. Cheers ! There are no PEP8 issues in this Pull Request. 🍻 Comment last updated on January 15, 2019 at 20:23 Hours UTC |
Just a comment.
…On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:39 AM Benjamin Rowell ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In pandas/tests/series/test_api.py
<#24754 (comment)>:
> @@ -245,10 +245,11 @@ def test_tab_completion(self):
def test_tab_completion_with_categorical(self):
# test the tab completion display
- ok_for_cat = ['categories', 'codes', 'ordered', 'set_categories',
Ah no worries.
When you say note on that property, is a comment sufficient, or do you
mean in the deprecation FutureWarning message?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#24754 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQHIgk_z0azVQ6WA6hqa68nOy2MQkBGks5vDhJBgaJpZM4Z9XZr>
.
|
961082c
to
9a0c381
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ping on green.
Thanks @benjaminr! |
…#24751 (pandas-dev#24754) * Implementation for CategoricalAccessor.categorical removed in 0.24.0rc1 pandas-dev#24751
…#24751 (pandas-dev#24754) * Implementation for CategoricalAccessor.categorical removed in 0.24.0rc1 pandas-dev#24751
git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff