-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate Series/Dataframe.to_dense/to_sparse #26668
Conversation
Hello @intell1gent! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found: There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻 Comment last updated at 2019-06-05 16:21:20 UTC |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #26668 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.87% 41.78% -50.1%
==========================================
Files 174 174
Lines 50663 50671 +8
==========================================
- Hits 46548 21172 -25376
- Misses 4115 29499 +25384
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #26668 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.87% 91.87% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 174 174
Lines 50663 50669 +6
==========================================
+ Hits 46548 46550 +2
- Misses 4115 4119 +4
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@intell1gent is there a reason you closed this? |
@jorisvandenbossche Sorry, there was some confusion on my side. Opened a new PR ( #26684 ) since this has become a bit messy. |
@intell1gent OK, will look at the other PR. Just a feedback for in the future: in general you don't need to make new PRs if something has become messy. If you clean up the branch locally and push again, the PR gets updated automatically. |
git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff
Marks the methods mentioned in #26557 as deprecated, with proper messages.