-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DEPR: is_extension_type #29457
DEPR: is_extension_type #29457
Conversation
Can this not be removed outright? It's non-public and sits behind an experimental interface, so I think not worth the effort of a deprecation cycle |
i wouldnt shed any tears if we removed it altogether |
I'm +1 to outright remove but let's see what @TomAugspurger and @jreback think |
is this in pd.api.types? if not ok to remove |
It’s not public right? So fine to just remove.
This predated the EA interface.
… On Nov 7, 2019, at 18:23, William Ayd ***@***.***> wrote:
I'm +1 to outright remove but let's see what @TomAugspurger and @jreback think
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
Yes, this is in pd.api.types. (via a |
really? it has a test that catches the earning? |
We have tests (updated appropriately in this PR) for deprecated functions
in this module.
…On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 5:29 PM Jeff Reback ***@***.***> wrote:
is this in pd.api.types?
Yes, this is in pd.api.types. (via a * import)
really? it has a test that catches the earning?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#29457?email_source=notifications&email_token=AB5UM6CRGPV2CITZPCDWCB3QSS6GNA5CNFSM4JKBUAJ2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEDONGXQ#issuecomment-551342942>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB5UM6DGRZX6UENGSIFMSMDQSS6GNANCNFSM4JKBUAJQ>
.
|
ok i see the change now, yeah have to deprecate can u add to the master depreciation issue (or create say a 1.2 removals issue) |
will do |
thanks @jbrockmendel |
It is mostly redundant with
is_extension_array_dtype
, and having both is confusing.xref #23179.