-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BUG+DEPR: undeprecate item, fix dt64/td64 output type #30175
Merged
jorisvandenbossche
merged 10 commits into
pandas-dev:master
from
jbrockmendel:depr-item
Dec 18, 2019
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0d2867d
BUG+DEPR: undeprecate item, fix dt64/td64 output type
jbrockmendel ef1c9ed
Update pandas/core/indexes/period.py
jbrockmendel f87f03a
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into de…
jbrockmendel c88bc14
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into de…
jbrockmendel a98fda2
restore python-scalar behavior, tests
jbrockmendel 39c13df
PeriodIndex.item no longer necessary
jbrockmendel aabcf92
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into de…
jbrockmendel 6c18f38
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into de…
jbrockmendel f6cb1b7
catch EA dtype
jbrockmendel de4baff
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into de…
jbrockmendel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was adding this condition discussed somewhere? I would have thought just keep existing behaviour
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the bugfix part. dt64, dt64tz, and td64 we're currently incorrectly returning int
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm doesn't this break non-DTA though?
I thought one of the points of item was to return a Python object (at least in the Numpy world)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
^ current behavior
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I think we should keep the behaviour of
item
to return a python scalar (where possible of course, so for datetime/timedelta it is fine to return a pandas Timestamp/Timedelta I think)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, will update.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Has this been resolved?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the concerns raised by @WillAyd and @jorisvandenbossche have been addressed