BUG: honor repr() of proper subclasses of dict/ODict in pprint_thing #3253
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@y-p this worth working on in 0.14? |
|
Sorry, missed this mention. No strong feelings either way, having pandas objects populated with as stated in #3251, pprint_dict didn't enfrorce a limit on nested sequences, which can If someone wants to pick this up for 0.14 - great, if not can close next time you go through stale issues. |
|
meh. Don't think we should try hard to support arbitrary objects inside dataframes. |
ghost
closed this
ghost
deleted the
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#3251
Have to consider corner cases before merging, rebased on top of #3252