Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docker: infer dependencies on COPY of pex binaries. #12920
docker: infer dependencies on COPY of pex binaries. #12920
Changes from 7 commits
c35c324
0d5f162
d3f4d0e
57c72b2
5cf1089
e553952
6b1f150
95be7d0
f635811
e3493fd
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not obvious to me that this is thread-safe. Assignment to a simple variable is atomic in Python, but there is no clear answer on whether assignment to a member (which involves the object's member dictionary) is atomic. In practice it probably depends on the implementation.
My apologies for making the regex issue more complicated than it needed to be, but I'm now thinking we should do the simple thing you did all along and compile at module load time, storing the compiled regex directly in the module. In v2 there are so few regexes that this is not going to be a performance issue. Again, sorry for spinning you in circles on this...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, now we've explored the alternatives and can motivate the (small) cost of load-time compiling the regexp. I can leave a short comment about it so it is not lost and forgotten.
Running in circles is common for me 🐶
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe
dockerfile_contents
? So it's obvious that you pass the contents, not a path?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After simplifying the regex, this can be a staticmethod again...