Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor!: switch from parking_lot to std::sync #473

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2022
Merged

Conversation

tiagolobocastro
Copy link
Collaborator

As pointed out in #438 the mutex performance between parking_lot should not adversely affect paperclip.
Also remove the mutexes altogether from the ApiError.

Unfortunately this is indeed a breaking change!

Resolves: #438

Signed-off-by: Tiago Castro tiagolobocastro@gmail.com

@tiagolobocastro tiagolobocastro force-pushed the std-locks branch 2 times, most recently from 92a7c77 to 3d71461 Compare October 16, 2022 21:57
@tiagolobocastro tiagolobocastro marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2022 22:11
As pointed out in 438 the mutex performance between parking_lot should not adversely affect
paperclip.
Also remove the mutexes altogether from the ApiError.

Unfortunately this is indeed a breaking change!

Resolves: #438

Signed-off-by: Tiago Castro <tiagolobocastro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiago Castro <tiagolobocastro@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consider using std::sync instead of parking_lot
1 participant