Add Action to rebase release PR to develop

[Thesola10]

This (as of yet untested) GitHub action will automatically detect PRs created against release and redirect them to develop (and leave a nice comment).

This only applies on creation, so PRs can still be rebased to release if needs be.

[Thesola10]

how nice, the PR is testing itself :3

... okay why is it taking so long to get a runner? @jtaala you think public runners are disabled in the PaperWM org?

[jtaala]

how nice, the PR is testing itself :3

... okay why is it taking so long to get a runner? @jtaala you think public runners are disabled in the PaperWM org?

I don't believe so. I've checked settings and actions settings allows all actions and resusable workflows. Says no runners are configured though.

[jtaala]

Looks like only option for runners is creating a self-hosted runner.

I'm not familiar with github runners though so not sure.

[jtaala]

There doesn't seem to be an option to add a github-hosted runner, maybe that only available in github enterprise?... or maybe it is blocked at the org level (note: I don't have org perms).

[Thesola10]

There doesn't seem to be an option to add a github-hosted runner, maybe that only available in github enterprise?... or maybe it is blocked at the org level (note: I don't have org perms).

Likely the latter. I control a solo org and I can enable GitHub runners on it. We might need @hedning for this one.

[jtaala]

We might need @hedning for this one.

Ouch, that may end up being a showstopper on this one then... unfortunately, we haven't heard from @hedning in a number of years :-(

[Thesola10]

Maybe @olejorgenb can help? They're also an org member and seem more active on their GitHub.

[jtaala]

Maybe @olejorgenb can help? They're also an org member and seem more active on their GitHub.

Well, we've pinged @olejorgenb in this chat - so he can respond if he's able to. I did get a response from @olejorgenb back in 2022, so it's possible.

[jtaala]

Looks fine to me.

Once we can run things (runner) in PaperWM can merge this in.

[olejorgenb]

I can help setting things up if there's missing access, but I'm not familiar with github runners, and don't have time to figure out the exact steps. To me it seems like a standard runner should be available though.

[Thesola10]

Thanks for checking @olejorgenb, maybe GitHub was just having a bad day ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[github-actions]

Thanks for your contribution! We don't accept pull requests to the release branch. I have rebased your pull request onto develop, check for any conflicts.

[Thesola10]

oh, finally. @jtaala if you have perms could you delete #772 and #773? sorry for the inconvenience!

[jtaala]

I can help setting things up if there's missing access, but I'm not familiar with github runners, and don't have time to figure out the exact steps. To me it seems like a standard runner should be available though.

Thanks @olejorgenb! Hope things are going well. Looks like it's it's working now.