Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove usage of RichBlock #10538

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Vid201
Copy link
Contributor

@Vid201 Vid201 commented Aug 26, 2024

No description provided.

@Vid201 Vid201 force-pushed the chore/rm_richblock branch from 76c8344 to 48be1cc Compare August 26, 2024 12:36
Copy link
Collaborator

@mattsse mattsse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm,
pending @klkvr, do we need WithOtherfields for block instead now that we removed other fields from block?
which could clash with #10537

@klkvr
Copy link
Collaborator

klkvr commented Aug 26, 2024

I've already changed it to WithOtherFields<Block> in #10537, but it doesn't seem like we rely on it anywhere?

@mattsse
Copy link
Collaborator

mattsse commented Aug 26, 2024

good point, the block responses for OP are identical so we don't need the otherfields here and I'd like to embed the Block type on the trait anyway.

so should we merge this? looks like we can do that?

@mattsse mattsse added the A-rpc Related to the RPC implementation label Aug 26, 2024
@mattsse mattsse added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into paradigmxyz:main with commit 4138b52 Aug 26, 2024
34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rpc Related to the RPC implementation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants