This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 379
Companion for #7005 #2433
Open
gilescope
wants to merge
22
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
giles-feemanager-companion
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Companion for #7005 #2433
Changes from 21 commits
Commits
Show all changes
22 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f8f6b17
Send xcm fees to local treaury
gilescope acfe2bd
should not include self
gilescope 0b8a880
Add collectives and contracts.
gilescope a09e954
Less error-prone specifying of system parachains
gilescope ac9b0fc
cargo fmt
gilescope e459514
update lock file
gilescope 0bfa2a7
Merge branch 'master' into giles-feemanager-companion
gilescope 6b46a4e
update lock file
gilescope 1ae37e4
Merge branch 'master' into giles-feemanager-companion
gilescope ef37dc6
No need for per-relay crates
gilescope e27bb1c
update lock file
gilescope 9706b64
Merge branch 'master' into giles-feemanager-companion
gilescope b1d0095
cargo fmt
gilescope 6d0a73b
Merge branch 'master' into giles-feemanager-companion
gilescope dc3ed54
fix typo
gilescope df241f4
merge master
joepetrowski c09ce60
some
joepetrowski abd2114
remove conflicting import
joepetrowski 6198b4f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into giles-feemanager-co…
d915244
Fix to compile
bkontur fa04975
More compile
bkontur 412ba3b
merge master
joepetrowski File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
here should be probably
return true
, because we want towaive
runtime itself not to pay fees (used forXcmFeesToAccount
),with
return false
runtime itself wont be waived, means it needs to payother question is if matching of
MultiLocation { parents: 0, interior: X1(Parachain(para_id))
shouldnt be replaced withHere
or better just remove this if for self-detectionThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we avoided matching ourself for the asset-conversion because we started trying to asset transfer native assets - we have explicit checks in the asset-coversion pallet now so I don't think this exception is now needed.