Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

slot-based-collator: Adjust ConsensusHook and parent search #3967

Open
skunert opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

slot-based-collator: Adjust ConsensusHook and parent search #3967

skunert opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”.

Comments

@skunert
Copy link
Contributor

skunert commented Apr 3, 2024

When a new parachain block is authored, we search for a parent that fits all constraints of the relay chain. This means that the parachain parent we want to build on needs to be anchored to a relay parent that is within the defined ancestry parameters. The logic currently assumes that we only have one pending candidate, which is not longer true.

entry.depth == 1 && pending_hash.as_ref().map_or(false, |h| &entry.hash == h);

We should make this aware of multiple pending candidates, after we have #3576

In addition, adjust (or create a new one) the FixedVelocityConsensusHook to take into account sub slots < 6s. It currently does its checks based on blocks authored so far in the current parachain slot:

let (last_slot, authored_so_far) = match pallet::SlotInfo::<T>::get() {

@skunert skunert added the T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”. label Apr 3, 2024
@skunert skunert added this to SDK Node Apr 3, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to backlog in SDK Node Apr 3, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2024
Part of #3168 
On top of #3568

### Changes Overview
- Introduces a new collator variant in
`cumulus/client/consensus/aura/src/collators/slot_based/mod.rs`
- Two tasks are part of that module, one for block building and one for
collation building and submission.
- Introduces a new variant of `cumulus-test-runtime` which has 2s slot
duration, used for zombienet testing
- Zombienet tests for the new collator

**Note:** This collator is considered experimental and should only be
used for testing and exploration for now.

### Comparison with `lookahead` collator
- The new variant is slot based, meaning it waits for the next slot of
the parachain, then starts authoring
- The search for potential parents remains mostly unchanged from
lookahead
- As anchor, we use the current best relay parent
- In general, the new collator tends to be anchored to one relay parent
earlier. `lookahead` generally waits for a new relay block to arrive
before it attempts to build a block. This means the actual timing of
parachain blocks depends on when the relay block has been authored and
imported. With the slot-triggered approach we are authoring directly on
the slot boundary, were a new relay chain block has probably not yet
arrived.

### Limitations
- Overall, the current implementation focuses on the "happy path"
- We assume that we want to collate close to the tip of the relay chain.
It would be useful however to have some kind of configurable drift, so
that we could lag behind a bit.
#3965
- The collation task is pretty dumb currently. It checks if we have
cores scheduled and if yes, submits all the messages we have received
from the block builder until we have something submitted for every core.
Ideally we should do some extra checks, i.e. we do not need to submit if
the built block is already too old (build on a out of range relay
parent) or was authored with a relay parent that is not an ancestor of
the relay block we are submitting at.
#3966
- There is no throttling, we assume that we can submit _velocity_ blocks
every relay chain block. There should be communication between the
collator task and block-builder task.
- The parent search and ConsensusHook are not yet properly adjusted. The
parent search makes assumptions about the pending candidate which no
longer hold. #3967
- Custom triggers for block building not implemented.

---------

Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <davxy@datawok.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <363911+pepoviola@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
TomaszWaszczyk pushed a commit to TomaszWaszczyk/polkadot-sdk that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2024
Part of paritytech#3168 
On top of paritytech#3568

### Changes Overview
- Introduces a new collator variant in
`cumulus/client/consensus/aura/src/collators/slot_based/mod.rs`
- Two tasks are part of that module, one for block building and one for
collation building and submission.
- Introduces a new variant of `cumulus-test-runtime` which has 2s slot
duration, used for zombienet testing
- Zombienet tests for the new collator

**Note:** This collator is considered experimental and should only be
used for testing and exploration for now.

### Comparison with `lookahead` collator
- The new variant is slot based, meaning it waits for the next slot of
the parachain, then starts authoring
- The search for potential parents remains mostly unchanged from
lookahead
- As anchor, we use the current best relay parent
- In general, the new collator tends to be anchored to one relay parent
earlier. `lookahead` generally waits for a new relay block to arrive
before it attempts to build a block. This means the actual timing of
parachain blocks depends on when the relay block has been authored and
imported. With the slot-triggered approach we are authoring directly on
the slot boundary, were a new relay chain block has probably not yet
arrived.

### Limitations
- Overall, the current implementation focuses on the "happy path"
- We assume that we want to collate close to the tip of the relay chain.
It would be useful however to have some kind of configurable drift, so
that we could lag behind a bit.
paritytech#3965
- The collation task is pretty dumb currently. It checks if we have
cores scheduled and if yes, submits all the messages we have received
from the block builder until we have something submitted for every core.
Ideally we should do some extra checks, i.e. we do not need to submit if
the built block is already too old (build on a out of range relay
parent) or was authored with a relay parent that is not an ancestor of
the relay block we are submitting at.
paritytech#3966
- There is no throttling, we assume that we can submit _velocity_ blocks
every relay chain block. There should be communication between the
collator task and block-builder task.
- The parent search and ConsensusHook are not yet properly adjusted. The
parent search makes assumptions about the pending candidate which no
longer hold. paritytech#3967
- Custom triggers for block building not implemented.

---------

Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <davxy@datawok.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <363911+pepoviola@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
TarekkMA pushed a commit to moonbeam-foundation/polkadot-sdk that referenced this issue Aug 2, 2024
Part of paritytech#3168 
On top of paritytech#3568

### Changes Overview
- Introduces a new collator variant in
`cumulus/client/consensus/aura/src/collators/slot_based/mod.rs`
- Two tasks are part of that module, one for block building and one for
collation building and submission.
- Introduces a new variant of `cumulus-test-runtime` which has 2s slot
duration, used for zombienet testing
- Zombienet tests for the new collator

**Note:** This collator is considered experimental and should only be
used for testing and exploration for now.

### Comparison with `lookahead` collator
- The new variant is slot based, meaning it waits for the next slot of
the parachain, then starts authoring
- The search for potential parents remains mostly unchanged from
lookahead
- As anchor, we use the current best relay parent
- In general, the new collator tends to be anchored to one relay parent
earlier. `lookahead` generally waits for a new relay block to arrive
before it attempts to build a block. This means the actual timing of
parachain blocks depends on when the relay block has been authored and
imported. With the slot-triggered approach we are authoring directly on
the slot boundary, were a new relay chain block has probably not yet
arrived.

### Limitations
- Overall, the current implementation focuses on the "happy path"
- We assume that we want to collate close to the tip of the relay chain.
It would be useful however to have some kind of configurable drift, so
that we could lag behind a bit.
paritytech#3965
- The collation task is pretty dumb currently. It checks if we have
cores scheduled and if yes, submits all the messages we have received
from the block builder until we have something submitted for every core.
Ideally we should do some extra checks, i.e. we do not need to submit if
the built block is already too old (build on a out of range relay
parent) or was authored with a relay parent that is not an ancestor of
the relay block we are submitting at.
paritytech#3966
- There is no throttling, we assume that we can submit _velocity_ blocks
every relay chain block. There should be communication between the
collator task and block-builder task.
- The parent search and ConsensusHook are not yet properly adjusted. The
parent search makes assumptions about the pending candidate which no
longer hold. paritytech#3967
- Custom triggers for block building not implemented.

---------

Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <davxy@datawok.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrei Sandu <54316454+sandreim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
Co-authored-by: Javier Viola <363911+pepoviola@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”.
Projects
Status: backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant