Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes TotalValueLocked out of sync in nomination pools #3052

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Feb 8, 2024

Conversation

gpestana
Copy link
Contributor

@gpestana gpestana commented Jan 24, 2024

The TotalLockedValue storage value in nomination pools pallet may get out of sync if the staking pallet does implicit withdrawal of unlocking chunks belonging to a bonded pool stash. This fix is based on a new method in the OnStakingUpdate traits, on_withdraw, which allows the nomination pools pallet to adjust the TotalLockedValue every time there is an implicit or explicit withdrawal from a bonded pool's stash.

This PR also adds a migration that checks and updates the on-chain TVL if it got out of sync due to the bug this PR fixes.

Changes to trait OnStakingUpdate

In order for staking to notify the nomination pools pallet that chunks where withdrew, we add a new method, on_withdraw to the OnStakingUpdate trait. The nomination pools pallet filters the withdraws that are related to bonded pool accounts and updates the TotalValueLocked accordingly.

Others

  • Adds try-state checks to the EPM/staking e2e tests
  • Adds tests for auto withdrawing in the context of nomination pools

To-do

  • check if we need a migration to fix the current TotalValueLocked (run try-runtime)
  • migrations to fix the current on-chain TVL value

Kusama:

TotalValueLocked: 99.4559 kKSM
TotalValueLocked (calculated) 99.4559 kKSM

⚠️ Westend:

TotalValueLocked: 18.4060 kWND
TotalValueLocked (calculated) 18.4050 kWND

Polkadot: TVL not released yet.

Closes #3055

@gpestana gpestana added the T10-tests This PR/Issue is related to tests. label Jan 24, 2024
@gpestana gpestana self-assigned this Jan 24, 2024
@gpestana gpestana requested review from a team January 24, 2024 18:43
@gpestana gpestana marked this pull request as draft January 24, 2024 18:43
@gpestana gpestana changed the title Adds e2e tests for auto withdrawing in the context of pools Fixes TotalValueLocked out of sync in nomination pools Jan 24, 2024
@gpestana gpestana marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2024 23:45
@gpestana gpestana added T1-FRAME This PR/Issue is related to core FRAME, the framework. T8-polkadot This PR/Issue is related to/affects the Polkadot network. labels Jan 24, 2024
@gpestana
Copy link
Contributor Author

bot fmt

@command-bot
Copy link

command-bot bot commented Jan 25, 2024

@gpestana https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/5024240 was started for your command "$PIPELINE_SCRIPTS_DIR/commands/fmt/fmt.sh". Check out https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/pipelines?page=1&scope=all&username=group_605_bot to know what else is being executed currently.

Comment bot cancel 21-b3c66b89-5687-4693-a834-052339423958 to cancel this command or bot cancel to cancel all commands in this pull request.

@command-bot
Copy link

command-bot bot commented Jan 25, 2024

@gpestana Command "$PIPELINE_SCRIPTS_DIR/commands/fmt/fmt.sh" has finished. Result: https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/5024240 has finished. If any artifacts were generated, you can download them from https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/5024240/artifacts/download.

prdoc/pr_3052.prdoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@rossbulat rossbulat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This warning comment for EventListeners should probably be updated to reflect the additional on_withdraw use case.

prdoc/pr_3052.prdoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
prdoc/pr_3052.prdoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@rossbulat rossbulat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Neat solution of fixing the issue and removing a function on the pools side. Looks like a good approval once the migration has been determined.

@@ -2265,7 +2244,8 @@ pub mod pallet {

// Before calculating the `balance_to_unbond`, we call withdraw unbonded to ensure the
// `transferrable_balance` is correct.
let stash_killed = bonded_pool.withdraw_from_staking(num_slashing_spans)?;
let stash_killed =
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we not update the TVL here, instead of needing the on_withdraw?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@gpestana gpestana Jan 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's what the fn withdraw_from_staking was doing. However that's insufficient because staking may withdraw unlocking chunks from a bonded pool account without an explicit request from pools. If that happens, the TVL in the pool is not updated.

This is the culprit code on the staking side: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/substrate/frame/staking/src/pallet/mod.rs#L1029-L1039.

gpestana and others added 4 commits January 28, 2024 12:13
Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <ross@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <ross@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <ross@parity.io>
@paritytech-cicd-pr
Copy link

The CI pipeline was cancelled due to failure one of the required jobs.
Job name: test-linux-stable 2/3
Logs: https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/5142739

@paritytech-cicd-pr
Copy link

The CI pipeline was cancelled due to failure one of the required jobs.
Job name: test-linux-stable 1/3
Logs: https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/5142738

@gpestana gpestana requested a review from rossbulat February 7, 2024 21:36
substrate/frame/nomination-pools/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@seadanda seadanda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - sorry for the grammatical tweaks 😀

substrate/frame/nomination-pools/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
substrate/frame/nomination-pools/src/mock.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
gpestana and others added 4 commits February 8, 2024 11:03
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <donal.murray@parity.io>
…/src/lib.rs

Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <donal.murray@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <donal.murray@parity.io>
@gpestana gpestana added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit aac07af Feb 8, 2024
126 of 127 checks passed
@gpestana gpestana deleted the gpestana/nom-pools-auto-withdraw branch February 8, 2024 18:51
bgallois pushed a commit to duniter/duniter-polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
…3052)

The `TotalLockedValue` storage value in nomination pools pallet may get
out of sync if the staking pallet does implicit withdrawal of unlocking
chunks belonging to a bonded pool stash. This fix is based on a new
method in the `OnStakingUpdate` traits, `on_withdraw`, which allows the
nomination pools pallet to adjust the `TotalLockedValue` every time
there is an implicit or explicit withdrawal from a bonded pool's stash.

This PR also adds a migration that checks and updates the on-chain TVL
if it got out of sync due to the bug this PR fixes.

**Changes to `trait OnStakingUpdate`**

In order for staking to notify the nomination pools pallet that chunks
where withdrew, we add a new method, `on_withdraw` to the
`OnStakingUpdate` trait. The nomination pools pallet filters the
withdraws that are related to bonded pool accounts and updates the
`TotalValueLocked` accordingly.

**Others**
- Adds try-state checks to the EPM/staking e2e tests
- Adds tests for auto withdrawing in the context of nomination pools

**To-do**
- [x] check if we need a migration to fix the current `TotalValueLocked`
(run try-runtime)
- [x] migrations to fix the current on-chain TVL value 

 ✅ **Kusama**:
```
TotalValueLocked: 99.4559 kKSM
TotalValueLocked (calculated) 99.4559 kKSM
```
⚠️ **Westend**:
```
TotalValueLocked: 18.4060 kWND
TotalValueLocked (calculated) 18.4050 kWND
```
**Polkadot**: TVL not released yet.

Closes paritytech#3055

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Co-authored-by: Ross Bulat <ross@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: Dónal Murray <donal.murray@parity.io>
AurevoirXavier added a commit to darwinia-network/darwinia that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T1-FRAME This PR/Issue is related to core FRAME, the framework. T8-polkadot This PR/Issue is related to/affects the Polkadot network. T10-tests This PR/Issue is related to tests.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Nomination Pools] TotalValueLocked is not properly updated when staking performs auto-withdraw
6 participants