-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 707
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bridge: added force_set_pallet_state call to pallet-bridge-grandpa #4465
Bridge: added force_set_pallet_state call to pallet-bridge-grandpa #4465
Conversation
bot help |
Here's a link to docs |
bot bench cumulus-bridge-hubs --pallet=pallet_bridge_grandpa |
@svyatonik https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/6230626 was started for your command Comment |
@svyatonik Command |
bot cancel |
@svyatonik No task is being executed for this pull request |
bot bench cumulus-bridge-hubs --pallet=pallet_bridge_grandpa |
@svyatonik https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/6231075 was started for your command Comment |
…=bridge-hub-rococo --runtime_dir=bridge-hubs --target_dir=cumulus --pallet=pallet_bridge_grandpa
@svyatonik Command |
bot bench cumulus-bridge-hubs --runtime=bridge-hub-westend --pallet=pallet_bridge_grandpa |
@svyatonik https://gitlab.parity.io/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/-/jobs/6237037 was started for your command Comment |
…=bridge-hub-westend --runtime_dir=bridge-hubs --target_dir=cumulus --pallet=pallet_bridge_grandpa
@svyatonik Command |
…aritytech#4465) closes paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2963 See issue above for rationale I've been thinking about adding similar calls to other pallets, but: - for parachains pallet I haven't been able to think of a case when we will need that given how long referendum takes. I.e. if storage proof format changes and we want to unstuck the bridge, it'll take a large a few weeks to sync a single parachain header, then another weeks for another and etc. - for messages pallet I've made the similar call initially, but it just changes a storage key (`OutboundLanes` and/or `InboundLanes`), so there's no any logic here and it may be simply done using `system.set_storage`. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
…aritytech#4465) closes paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2963 See issue above for rationale I've been thinking about adding similar calls to other pallets, but: - for parachains pallet I haven't been able to think of a case when we will need that given how long referendum takes. I.e. if storage proof format changes and we want to unstuck the bridge, it'll take a large a few weeks to sync a single parachain header, then another weeks for another and etc. - for messages pallet I've made the similar call initially, but it just changes a storage key (`OutboundLanes` and/or `InboundLanes`), so there's no any logic here and it may be simply done using `system.set_storage`. --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
closes paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2963
See issue above for rationale
I've been thinking about adding similar calls to other pallets, but:
OutboundLanes
and/orInboundLanes
), so there's no any logic here and it may be simply done usingsystem.set_storage
.