Aura: Ensure we are building on each relay chain fork #5352
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We only want to build one block per slot for Aura on parachains. However, we still need to build on each relay chain fork, which is using the same slot.
|
This seems fine imho. There is techncially a DoS vector here of course, but mostly we design messaging and bridges to prefent exploiting that sort of thing. |
davxy
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2024
skunert
reviewed
Aug 14, 2024
Co-authored-by: Davide Galassi <davxy@datawok.net>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <skunert49@gmail.com>
skunert
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2024
alexggh
approved these changes
Aug 15, 2024
ordian
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
* master: Remove redundant minimal template workspace (#5330) approval-distribution: Fix handling of conclude (#5375) More logs in `is_potential_spam` from `dispute-coordinator` (#5252) Fix zombienet bridges test (#5373) Update Readme of the `polkadot` crate (#5326) allow for `u8` to be used as hold/freeze reason (#5348) Moving cargo check for runtimes to GHA (#5340) Update links in the documentation (#5175) fix visibility for `pallet_nfts` types used as call arguments (#3634) Correct some typos in crates' descriptions (#5262) Aura: Ensure we are building on each relay chain fork (#5352) Update Identity pallet README.md (#5183) Bump trie-db from 0.29.0 to 0.29.1 (#5231) [Coretime] Always include UnpaidExecution, not just when revenue is > 0 (#5369) [Pools] fix derivation of pool account (#4999)
ordian
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
* master: Remove redundant minimal template workspace (#5330) approval-distribution: Fix handling of conclude (#5375) More logs in `is_potential_spam` from `dispute-coordinator` (#5252) Fix zombienet bridges test (#5373) Update Readme of the `polkadot` crate (#5326) allow for `u8` to be used as hold/freeze reason (#5348) Moving cargo check for runtimes to GHA (#5340) Update links in the documentation (#5175) fix visibility for `pallet_nfts` types used as call arguments (#3634) Correct some typos in crates' descriptions (#5262) Aura: Ensure we are building on each relay chain fork (#5352) Update Identity pallet README.md (#5183) Bump trie-db from 0.29.0 to 0.29.1 (#5231) [Coretime] Always include UnpaidExecution, not just when revenue is > 0 (#5369) [Pools] fix derivation of pool account (#4999) Upgrade accidentally downgraded deps (#5365) [Pools] Fix issues with member migration to `DelegateStake` (#4822) Unify `no_genesis` check (#5360) [CI] Fix prdoc command (#5358) Beefy: add benchmarks for `report_fork_voting()` (#5188)
ordian
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
…ct-candidate-weight * ao-fix-parainclusion-weight-overestimation: Remove redundant minimal template workspace (#5330) approval-distribution: Fix handling of conclude (#5375) More logs in `is_potential_spam` from `dispute-coordinator` (#5252) Fix zombienet bridges test (#5373) Update Readme of the `polkadot` crate (#5326) allow for `u8` to be used as hold/freeze reason (#5348) Moving cargo check for runtimes to GHA (#5340) Update links in the documentation (#5175) fix visibility for `pallet_nfts` types used as call arguments (#3634) Correct some typos in crates' descriptions (#5262) Aura: Ensure we are building on each relay chain fork (#5352) Update Identity pallet README.md (#5183) Bump trie-db from 0.29.0 to 0.29.1 (#5231) [Coretime] Always include UnpaidExecution, not just when revenue is > 0 (#5369) [Pools] fix derivation of pool account (#4999) Upgrade accidentally downgraded deps (#5365) [Pools] Fix issues with member migration to `DelegateStake` (#4822) Unify `no_genesis` check (#5360) [CI] Fix prdoc command (#5358) Beefy: add benchmarks for `report_fork_voting()` (#5188)
|
We could imagine parachains not being able to do this, like because of forks with different ancestors, and blocks being expensive. In particular we'd maybe lose this if we ever added some really CPU heavy storage. What goes wrong in that situation? Just hte obvious that some slots get skipped? |
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We only want to build one block per slot for Aura on parachains. However, we still need to build on each relay chain fork, which is using the same slot.
Closes: #5349