-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
introduce trusted teleporter Encointer for Rococo and Westend #4213
introduce trusted teleporter Encointer for Rococo and Westend #4213
Conversation
Looks OK to me. |
was able to teleport from rococo-local (this PR) to our parachain master: https://github.com/encointer/encointer-parachain |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't really have a strong opinion with test networks; anyone should be able to just configure themselves be a trusted teleporter.
Just one thing though: Westend doesn't allow for unpaid executions from anything other than a system parachain, whereas in this PR for Rococo, you've explicitly whitelisted Encointer for the barrier. Is this sufficient for your testing purposes? |
@KiChjang Our parachain comes without a root origin and starts with zero token supply (apart from the ED for the treasury account). What we need for testing is:
That would be enough ATM |
Okay, just making sure that you're aware that Westend has a different barrier condition from Rococo, i.e. if you're ever getting a |
1bbf029
to
141d65b
Compare
rebased on polkadot-0.9.13 |
141d65b
to
2c36766
Compare
Now that Encointer has been ratified to become a common good parachain on Kusama, can we merge this for the next runtime upgrade? |
* master: Bump tokio from 1.14.0 to 1.15.0 (#4537) Bump mick-jaeger from 0.1.6 to 0.1.7 (#4538) Versi chainspec based on Rococo. (#4485) Bump proc-macro2 from 1.0.33 to 1.0.34 (#4526) fix compile with new compiler - dead code (#4530) introduce trusted parachain Encointer for rococo and westend (#4213) add Encointer TrustedTeleporter (#4401) Bump libc from 0.2.109 to 0.2.112 (#4522) Bump serde_json from 1.0.72 to 1.0.73 (#4523)
After discussion with @gavofyork, we have adjusted our common good parachain governance model. As desired for common good, there will be no root origin on the parachain and with this PR we'd like to be included in the trusted teleport set.
We believe this is in line with Kusama council's decision to accept Encointer as a common good:
Discussion: https://kusama.polkassembly.io/post/610
Executed signalling motion: https://kusama.polkassembly.io/motion/357
As discussed with @joepetrowski, we'd test teleport on rococo first and wait for this PR to enter a release before testing teleport and set_code on westmint
@joepetrowski may I ask for your review? Should this work?