This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
configuration: Consistency checks for PVF pre-checking #4580
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Current dependencies on/for this PR:
This comment was auto-generated by Graphite. |
This was referenced Dec 22, 2021
pepyakin
added
B7-runtimenoteworthy
C1-low
PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
D5-nicetohaveaudit ⚠️
PR contains trivial changes to logic that should be properly reviewed.
B0-silent
Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
and removed
B7-runtimenoteworthy
labels
Dec 22, 2021
pepyakin
force-pushed
the
pep-unified-consistency-checks
branch
from
December 22, 2021 15:21
2a56742
to
425bf75
Compare
pepyakin
force-pushed
the
pep-pvf-consistency-checks
branch
from
December 22, 2021 15:21
c7def0e
to
011861e
Compare
1 task
bkchr
approved these changes
Dec 23, 2021
pepyakin
force-pushed
the
pep-unified-consistency-checks
branch
from
December 24, 2021 14:43
425bf75
to
f0223e0
Compare
pepyakin
force-pushed
the
pep-pvf-consistency-checks
branch
from
December 24, 2021 14:43
011861e
to
46cfb34
Compare
As was suggested by Alexander Popiak [here][comment], this commit checks the consistency of the configuration. [comment]: #4420 (comment)
pepyakin
force-pushed
the
pep-pvf-consistency-checks
branch
from
December 27, 2021 14:25
46cfb34
to
8990811
Compare
ordian
approved these changes
Dec 27, 2021
drahnr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2022
As was suggested by Alexander Popiak [here][comment], this commit checks the consistency of the configuration. [comment]: #4420 (comment)
jakoblell
added
D1-audited 👍
PR contains changes to critical logic that has been properly reviewed and externally audited.
and removed
D5-nicetohaveaudit ⚠️
PR contains trivial changes to logic that should be properly reviewed.
labels
Jan 18, 2022
Wizdave97
pushed a commit
to ComposableFi/polkadot
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2022
As was suggested by Alexander Popiak [here][comment], this commit checks the consistency of the configuration. [comment]: paritytech#4420 (comment)
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
A0-please_review
Pull request needs code review.
B0-silent
Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
C1-low
PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
D1-audited 👍
PR contains changes to critical logic that has been properly reviewed and externally audited.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As was suggested by Alexander Popiak here, this commit
checks the consistency of the configuration.