This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
Better Parameterisation for Fee system #3823
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0a5e4db
Better fee parameters
kianenigma fd1867a
Fix build
kianenigma bd284fa
Master.into()
kianenigma 734bfd8
Better runtime tests
kianenigma 9fef4e5
Price to Weight ratio as type parameter (#3856)
JoshOrndorff d1d57d1
Fix tests.
kianenigma 65fee2d
Master.into()
kianenigma 1709e84
Remove todo
kianenigma 3448f85
Fix build
kianenigma File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if this is only for testing, then why not ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair point and I (naively) used the gating feature that I used here https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/pull/3823/files#diff-24bd3cac4cae1c620f82f7aa79ef28ceR707
Declaring the function with just
#[cfg(test)]
was not enough and it cannot be found in tests though 🤔 and I had to make ittest or std
. Do you know the reason of the differenceThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that logically it should be just
cfg[test]
. Something is wrong maybe in cargo filesThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh actually this is because the test configure is only set for the tested crate.
if you test the runtime then sr-arithmetic isn't compiled with
test
.I don't know what is the prefered way to solve this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(won't work as discussed on off-band. will leave the comment open)