-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
Conversation
It looks like @seunlanlege signed our Contributor License Agreement. 👍 Many thanks, Parity Technologies CLA Bot |
…e-great-client-refactor
So the library was updated and the stack frame has changed as a result, not sure how to go about this though. |
Also this:
|
Impressive work. @seunlanlege Are there still any pending issues with this PR? If not, let's rebase and merge. @svyatonik Could you please check if there are any potential issues with the light client changes? |
-> Result< | ||
Service< | ||
ConcreteBlock, | ||
ConcreteClient, | ||
LongestChain<ConcreteBackend, ConcreteBlock>, | ||
NetworkStatus<ConcreteBlock>, | ||
NetworkService<ConcreteBlock, <ConcreteBlock as BlockT>::Hash>, | ||
ConcreteTransactionPool, | ||
OffchainWorkers< | ||
ConcreteClient, | ||
<ConcreteBackend as sc_client_api::backend::Backend<Block>>::OffchainStorage, | ||
ConcreteBlock, | ||
> | ||
>, | ||
ServiceError, | ||
> | ||
-> Result<impl AbstractService, ServiceError> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same. Please bring it back.
Please make sure your polkadot changes work with cumulus. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, this is a big step forwards. Let's please restrict the actual requirements a bit and make sure that we have a patch pending for cumulus if necessary.
@gnunicorn is this eligible for a mergeoncegreen tag? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
bot merge |
So this works with cumulus? |
Will have a PR for cumulus ready soon. |
see #4452