-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Load latest metadata version from Wasm blobs. #1859
Conversation
macro/src/wasm_loader.rs
Outdated
} | ||
|
||
fn decode(encoded_metadata: Vec<u8>) -> WasmMetadataResult<Metadata> { | ||
Metadata::decode(&mut encoded_metadata.as_ref()).map_err(Into::into) | ||
// We slice the first byte from the metadata because it's wrapped inside an option and we know that its always `Some` | ||
let metadata = <Vec<u8>>::decode(&mut &encoded_metadata[1..]).map_err(CodegenError::Decode)?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Would this panic on empty encoded_metadata
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, probably, will change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that the following code would work 😄
let metadata = <Option<Vec<u8>>>::decode(&mut &encoded_metadata[..]).map_err(CodegenError::Decode)?;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
refactored a bit to also fail on None
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great job here!
Thinking outloud here, maybe a followup: it would be useful at some point to extend the functionality of this module:
- have a
WasmBlobExecutor
wrapper that is handling just the executor building and runtime blob - then we could expose
WasmBlobExecutor::versions
which calls intoMetadata_metadata_versions
- similar for
WasmBlobExecutor::get_metadata(version: ..)
This way we can choose in our macros which version to use (most prob the lastest, but sometimes we may want to fallback to lastest stable instead of unstable)
macro/src/wasm_loader.rs
Outdated
Ok(versions) | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn metadata(&mut self) -> WasmMetadataResult<Metadata> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: I'd call this something like load_legacy_metadata
or something to be consistent with below (and make clear it's the "old" call :))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
renamed to load_legacy_metadata
macro/src/wasm_loader.rs
Outdated
decode(encoded_metadata) | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn load_metadata_at_latest_version( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a nit and can be ignored, but personally I'd break the interface down a bit so that we maybe just expose basic wrappers around:
Metadata_metadata()
,Metadata_metadata_versions()
andMetadata_metadata_at_version(version)
These wrapperes just call the associated runtime API and give back the decoded result and nothing more.
In other words, load_metadata_at_latest_version
here would just take in a single version to try and load, and the logic for handling versions is in the call_and_decode
function rather than here. versions
would equally just return the versions and not pre-filter them; we'd filter them also in call_and_decode
or whatever.
This way, the "important" logic is all visible in one place and what these functions do is trivial.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, nice one!
Not needed in this PR but I wonder how easily one could make a coupel of small-as-possible test runtimes exposing the new and old APIs to test that we get the expected V14 or V15 metadatas from them. May not be worth the effort though..
Description
closes #1858