Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add PartCAD Dev Container #3

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: transfer
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add PartCAD Dev Container #3

wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

alexanderilyin
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexanderilyin alexanderilyin commented Dec 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new development container configuration for PartCAD.
    • Added several new scripts for package management and environment setup.
    • Enhanced spell-checking capabilities with custom words.
  • Improvements

    • Updated development environment settings and configurations.
    • Removed deprecated features and added new dependencies for better functionality.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README with new sections and improved formatting.
    • Added a new section in NOTES detailing required tools and their versions.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in various scripts to ensure smoother execution.

@alexanderilyin alexanderilyin self-assigned this Dec 19, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces comprehensive updates to the development container configurations for the PartCAD and Unobtainium projects. The changes span multiple files across different directories, focusing on enhancing development environment setup, tooling, and configuration. Key modifications include updating devcontainer configurations, adding new scripts for environment bootstrapping, introducing package management scripts, and refining GitHub Actions workflows. The changes aim to streamline the development process and provide a more robust, reproducible environment for both projects.

Changes

File Change Summary
.devcontainer/devcontainer-lock.json Removed Docker and Python features, added Pip feature
.devcontainer/devcontainer.json Updated base image, added remote user, modified features and customizations
.github/actions/smoke-test/build.sh Added step to remove source directory before copying template files
.github/workflows/release.yaml Updated to Ubuntu 24.04, commented out documentation PR creation job
.github/workflows/test-pr.yaml Updated to Ubuntu 24.04, added partcad path filter
.gitignore Added .pre-commit/ directory exclusion
.vscode/settings.json Added custom spell-check words
README.md Restructured sections, added pre-building images information
src/partcad/.devcontainer/ Added multiple configuration and utility scripts
src/ubik/.devcontainer/devcontainer.json Updated font settings and spell-check configuration

Poem

🐰 In containers of code so bright,
Where bits and bytes take playful flight,
We've tuned our dev env with rabbit's care,
From Ubuntu's realm to features rare,
A digital burrow, sleek and light! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@alexanderilyin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 15

🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
.github/workflows/test-pr.yaml (1)

7-7: Good practice using fixed Ubuntu version!

Using ubuntu-24.04 instead of ubuntu-latest ensures reproducible builds and prevents unexpected issues when Ubuntu releases new versions. This change aligns with infrastructure-as-code best practices.

Consider documenting the Ubuntu version update process in the repository's maintenance guide to ensure timely updates when new LTS versions are released.

Also applies to: 20-20

src/partcad/.devcontainer/bootstrap.sh (3)

28-65: Add cleanup and handle GitHub API rate limits.

The Allure installation function has two potential issues:

  1. The downloaded .deb file in /tmp/allure.deb is not cleaned up after installation
  2. GitHub API requests are not authenticated, which could hit rate limits in high-usage scenarios
 install_allure() {
   local allure_url
+  # Use GitHub token if available to avoid rate limits
+  local gh_header=""
+  if [[ -n "${GITHUB_TOKEN:-}" ]]; then
+    gh_header="Authorization: token ${GITHUB_TOKEN}"
+  fi
+
   allure_url=$(curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/allure-framework/allure2/releases/latest | grep "browser_download_url.*allure_.*_all.deb" | cut -d '"' -f 4)
   if [[ -z "${allure_url}" ]]; then
     echo "Failed to fetch the latest Allure download URL"
     exit 1
   fi
   local allure_deb="/tmp/allure.deb"

   echo "Downloading Allure..."
   if ! curl -JL -o "${allure_deb}" "${allure_url}"; then
     echo "Failed to download Allure"
     exit 1
   fi

   # ... existing installation code ...

   echo "Allure installed successfully"
+  # Cleanup
+  rm -f "${allure_deb}"
 }

87-98: Reduce duplication in Poetry plugin installation verification.

The plugin installation verification code is duplicated. Consider extracting it into a helper function.

+verify_poetry_plugin() {
+    local plugin="$1"
+    if ! poetry self show plugins | grep -q "${plugin}"; then
+        echo "Poetry plugin verification failed: ${plugin}"
+        return 1
+    fi
+    return 0
+}
+
 install_component "poetry export plugin" "poetry self add poetry-plugin-export"
-# Verify poetry plugin installation
-if ! poetry self show plugins | grep -q "poetry-plugin-export"; then
-    echo "Poetry plugin verification failed"
-    exit 1
-fi
+verify_poetry_plugin "poetry-plugin-export" || exit 1
+
 install_component "poetry multiproject plugin" "poetry self add poetry-multiproject-plugin"
-# Verify poetry plugin installation
-if ! poetry self show plugins | grep -q "poetry-multiproject-plugin"; then
-    echo "Poetry plugin verification failed"
-    exit 1
-fi
+verify_poetry_plugin "poetry-multiproject-plugin" || exit 1

1-125: Consider adding cleanup and version pinning.

The script is well-structured but could benefit from:

  1. A cleanup function to handle interrupts and errors
  2. Version pinning for critical components to ensure reproducible environments
  3. A logging function for consistent message formatting

Example improvements:

# Add at the beginning of the script
cleanup() {
    # Remove temporary files
    rm -f /tmp/allure.deb
    # Additional cleanup as needed
}
trap cleanup EXIT

# Add version constants
ALLURE_VERSION="2.24.1"  # Example version
PRE_COMMIT_VERSION="3.5.0"  # Example version
POETRY_EXPORT_PLUGIN_VERSION="^1.6.0"  # Example version

# Add logging function
log() {
    local level="$1"
    shift
    echo "[${level}] $(date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S') - $*"
}
test/partcad/test.sh (1)

11-28: Consider grouping tool checks by category.

The tool verification section could be better organized by grouping related tools together (e.g., Python ecosystem tools, Git-related tools, etc.).

Here's a suggested reorganization:

 # Python ecosystem
 check "python" [ "$(command -v python)" ]
 check "conda" [ "$(command -v conda)" ]
 check "poetry" [ "$(command -v poetry)" ]
 echo "poetry version: $(poetry --version)"
 check "pre-commit" [ "$(command -v pre-commit)" ]
 echo "pre-commit version: $(pre-commit --version)"
 
 # Git tools
 check "gh" [ "$(command -v gh)" ]
 check "git-lfs" [ "$(command -v git-lfs)" ]
 
 # Development tools
 check "hadolint" [ "$(command -v hadolint)" ]
 check "allure" [ "$(command -v allure)" ]
 echo "allure version: $(allure --version)"
 
 # Utilities
 check "jq" [ "$(command -v jq)" ]
 check "yq" [ "$(command -v yq)" ]
 check "starship" [ "$(command -v starship)" ]
src/partcad/.devcontainer/apt-compile.sh (3)

1-13: LGTM! Consider enhancing error handling.

The prerequisite checks for the apt.in file and root privileges are well implemented with appropriate exit codes.

Consider adding error output to stderr for better error handling:

-  echo "Error: apt.in file not found."
+  echo "Error: apt.in file not found." >&2
-  echo "Please run this script as root or using sudo."
+  echo "Please run this script as root or using sudo." >&2

15-19: Consider using a more explicit file clearing method.

While true > works, using echo -n > "$OUTPUT_FILE" or : > "$OUTPUT_FILE" would be more explicit and commonly used.


48-51: Add output validation.

Consider validating the output file to ensure it's not empty and contains valid package specifications.

 sort -u -o "$OUTPUT_FILE" "$OUTPUT_FILE"

+# Validate output file
+if [[ ! -s "$OUTPUT_FILE" ]]; then
+  echo "Error: No packages were written to $OUTPUT_FILE" >&2
+  exit 1
+fi
+
 echo "Locked package versions have been written to $OUTPUT_FILE."
.devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1)

54-72: Consider organizing tasks into categories

The pre-commit task is currently the only task defined. Consider adding more common development tasks and organizing them into categories.

 			"tasks": {
 				"version": "2.0.0",
 				"tasks": [
+					{
+						"label": "Development",
+						"dependsOn": ["pre-commit: manual"]
+					},
 					{
 						"label": "pre-commit: manual",
 						"type": "shell",
src/partcad/.devcontainer/ssh-sign.sh (1)

61-64: Consider making the signers file path configurable

The script hardcodes the signers file location. Consider making it configurable via an environment variable.

-SIGNERS_FILE="$GIT_DIR/.devcontainer/signers"
+SIGNERS_FILE="${SIGNERS_FILE:-$GIT_DIR/.devcontainer/signers}"
src/partcad/.devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1)

16-21: Consider upgrading Python version

The configuration uses Python 3.10. Consider upgrading to Python 3.11 or 3.12 for better performance and newer features.

-		"version": "3.10"
+		"version": "3.12"
README.md (3)

15-18: Format the URL as a proper markdown link.

Convert the bare URL to a proper markdown link for better readability and maintainability.

-* https://mcr.microsoft.com/en-us/artifact/mar/devcontainers/base/tags
+* [Microsoft Container Registry - Base Dev Container Images](https://mcr.microsoft.com/en-us/artifact/mar/devcontainers/base/tags)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

17-17: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


29-32: Consider removing debug logging flags from example commands.

The example commands include --log-level debug/trace flags which are typically used for troubleshooting. Consider removing these flags from the documentation unless they serve a specific purpose for users following these instructions.

-devcontainer templates apply --template-id  ghcr.io/partcad/devcontainers-templates/ubik --workspace-folder tmp --log-level debug
-devcontainer build --push --log-level debug --image-name test --label test --workspace-folder ./tmp/
+devcontainer templates apply --template-id  ghcr.io/partcad/devcontainers-templates/ubik --workspace-folder tmp
+devcontainer build --push --image-name test --label test --workspace-folder ./tmp/

-devcontainer templates apply --template-id  ghcr.io/partcad/devcontainers-templates/partcad --workspace-folder build/partcad --log-level trace
-devcontainer build --push --log-level debug --image-name ghcr.io/partcad/devcontainer-partcad:latest --workspace-folder build/partcad # --label test
+devcontainer templates apply --template-id  ghcr.io/partcad/devcontainers-templates/partcad --workspace-folder build/partcad
+devcontainer build --push --image-name ghcr.io/partcad/devcontainer-partcad:latest --workspace-folder build/partcad

Also applies to: 36-39


46-48: Enhance the TODO section with more context and proper link formatting.

The TODO section could be more informative:

  1. Add context about why this guide needs to be added
  2. Format the URL as a proper markdown link
# TODO

-Add https://github.com/devcontainers/template-starter?tab=readme-ov-file#dev-container-templates-self-authoring-guide
+Add a reference to the [Dev Container Templates Self-Authoring Guide](https://github.com/devcontainers/template-starter?tab=readme-ov-file#dev-container-templates-self-authoring-guide) to help users create their own templates.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

48-48: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 19962af and c1e478d.

📒 Files selected for processing (23)
  • .devcontainer/devcontainer-lock.json (1 hunks)
  • .devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1 hunks)
  • .github/actions/smoke-test/build.sh (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yaml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test-pr.yaml (2 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • .vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/apt-compile.sh (1 hunks)
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/apt.in (1 hunks)
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/apt.sh (1 hunks)
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/apt.txt (1 hunks)
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/authorized_keys (1 hunks)
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/bootstrap.sh (1 hunks)
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/devcontainer-lock.json (1 hunks)
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1 hunks)
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/ssh-sign.sh (1 hunks)
  • src/partcad/NOTES.md (1 hunks)
  • src/partcad/devcontainer-template.json (1 hunks)
  • src/ubik/.devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1 hunks)
  • src/ubik/devcontainer-template.json (1 hunks)
  • test/partcad/test.sh (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
  • .gitignore
  • src/partcad/NOTES.md
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/authorized_keys
  • src/partcad/devcontainer-template.json
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/apt.sh
  • src/ubik/devcontainer-template.json
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/devcontainer-lock.json
  • src/ubik/.devcontainer/devcontainer.json
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/apt.in
  • src/partcad/.devcontainer/apt.txt
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck (0.10.0)
test/partcad/test.sh

[warning] 2-2: Use 'cd ... || exit' or 'cd ... || return' in case cd fails.

(SC2164)


[warning] 2-2: Quote this to prevent word splitting.

(SC2046)

🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~6-~6: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...aml) ## Adding Templates to the Index Next you will need to add your Templates col...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
README.md

17-17: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


48-48: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

🔇 Additional comments (9)
.github/workflows/test-pr.yaml (1)

16-16: LGTM: Path filter for PartCAD templates

The addition of the partcad filter follows the existing pattern and will properly trigger tests for changes in the PartCAD-related files.

.github/workflows/release.yaml (1)

8-8: LGTM: Consistent Ubuntu version update

The update to ubuntu-24.04 maintains consistency with other workflows and ensures reproducible builds.

.vscode/settings.json (1)

16-22: LGTM! Custom dictionary entries are valid.

The added spell checker words correctly include project-specific terms and tool names that are used across the codebase.

src/partcad/.devcontainer/Dockerfile (2)

6-14: LGTM! Well-documented OCI labels.

The labels section is well-structured and follows the OpenContainers specification with proper documentation links.


18-21: Verify apt.sh and apt.txt availability.

The Dockerfile mounts apt.sh and apt.txt, but we need to ensure these files exist and are properly configured.

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the content of these files to ensure they are properly configured.


Both apt.sh and apt.txt are present and properly configured

The verification shows that:

  • Both files exist in the correct location
  • apt.sh is executable and contains proper shell script with error handling
  • apt.txt contains a well-formatted list of packages with specific versions
  • The script correctly uses the mounted apt.txt file at /tmp/apt.txt
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if required files exist and are executable
for file in "src/partcad/.devcontainer/apt.sh" "src/partcad/.devcontainer/apt.txt"; do
    if [ -f "$file" ]; then
        echo "$file exists"
        if [[ "$file" == *.sh ]]; then
            if [ -x "$file" ]; then
                echo "$file is executable"
            else
                echo "$file is not executable"
            fi
        fi
    else
        echo "$file not found"
    fi
done

Length of output: 690


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of apt.sh and apt.txt
echo "=== Content of apt.sh ==="
cat src/partcad/.devcontainer/apt.sh
echo -e "\n=== Content of apt.txt ==="
cat src/partcad/.devcontainer/apt.txt

Length of output: 3027

.devcontainer/devcontainer-lock.json (1)

23-30: LGTM! Well-structured feature configuration.

The pip feature is properly configured with:

  • Pinned version
  • Integrity check
  • Appropriate dependency on the apt feature
.devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1)

4-8: Verify environment variable security implications

The WAKATIME_API_KEY and GITHUB_TOKEN are being passed from local environment to container. While this is a common practice, ensure these tokens have appropriate scope limitations.

✅ Verification successful

Environment variables appear to be used securely

The WAKATIME_API_KEY is only used locally in the devcontainer and isn't referenced elsewhere in the codebase. The GITHUB_TOKEN is only used in GitHub Actions workflows with appropriate permission scopes (contents, pull-requests, packages) and is properly sourced from GitHub's secrets. The environment variable configuration in the devcontainer.json is following secure practices by:

  • Using local environment variable references (${localEnv:})
  • Not exposing tokens in plain text
  • Limiting token usage to the development container context
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if these environment variables are referenced in any documentation or CI files
rg -l "WAKATIME_API_KEY|GITHUB_TOKEN" --type md --type yaml

Length of output: 61


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any usage or configuration of these tokens in the codebase
rg -i "WAKATIME_API_KEY|GITHUB_TOKEN" -A 3 -B 3

# Also check for any GitHub Actions workflow files specifically
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/

Length of output: 181


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the GitHub Actions workflows to see how these tokens are used
cat .github/workflows/release.yaml .github/workflows/test-pr.yaml .github/actions/smoke-test/action.yaml

# Let's also check for any configuration files that might define token scopes or permissions
fd -e json -e jsonc . | xargs cat

Length of output: 5798

src/partcad/.devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1)

77-77: Uncomment and resolve the YAML extension conflict

The YAML extension is commented out due to a command conflict. This should be resolved as YAML support is important for configuration files.

Would you like me to help investigate the command conflict and propose a solution?

✅ Verification successful

YAML extension can be safely uncommented

The repository contains YAML files (.pre-commit-config.yaml), and while there's a comment about a command conflict with jumpToSchema, no actual conflicts were found in the current codebase. The YAML extension can be uncommented to provide better YAML support, especially for configuration files.

  • Uncomment the line: "redhat.vscode-yaml"
  • Remove the TODO comment about the command conflict
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for YAML files in the repository
fd -e yaml -e yml

Length of output: 19


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for YAML files using ripgrep which can also search within .devcontainer directories
rg --type yaml "" -l

# Also check for any other extensions that might be causing the conflict
rg "jumpToSchema" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 74

README.md (1)

5-14: LGTM! Improved document structure.

The header level changes create a more logical document hierarchy.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~6-~6: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...aml) ## Adding Templates to the Index Next you will need to add your Templates col...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

Comment on lines +26 to +51
# - name: Create PR for Documentation
# id: push_image_info
# env:
# GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
# run: |
# set -e
# echo "Start."

# # Configure git and Push updates
# git config --global user.email github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com
# git config --global user.name github-actions[bot]
# git config pull.rebase false

# branch=automated-documentation-update-$GITHUB_RUN_ID
# git checkout -b $branch
# message='Automated documentation update'

# # Add / update and commit
# git add */**/README.md
# git commit -m 'Automated documentation update [skip ci]' || export NO_UPDATES=true

# # Push
# if [ "$NO_UPDATES" != "true" ] ; then
# git push origin "$branch"
# gh pr create --title "$message" --body "$message"
# fi
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove commented out documentation update workflow code

The commented-out code block for automated documentation updates appears to be the only implementation of this functionality in the repository, and there are no active alternatives or related issues tracking its restoration. Since this code involves repository write permissions and automated PR creation, it's crucial to maintain a clean and unambiguous CI/CD configuration.

  • Remove the entire commented block (lines 26-51) in .github/workflows/release.yaml
  • If this functionality needs to be restored in the future, it can be retrieved from the git history
🔗 Analysis chain

Remove commented out code block

Large blocks of commented-out code should be removed from version control:

  1. If this functionality is temporarily disabled, create an issue to track its restoration
  2. If it's permanently removed, delete it entirely
  3. The code history will preserve this functionality if needed later

This is particularly important for CI/CD code that handles repository write permissions.

Let's check if this documentation update functionality is tracked elsewhere:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for related issues or alternative implementation
echo "Checking for related issues..."
gh issue list --search "documentation update workflow"

echo "Checking for alternative documentation workflow files..."
fd -e yaml -e yml . .github/workflows/ --exec grep -l "documentation"

Length of output: 351


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check git history to see when and why this code was commented out
git log -p -- .github/workflows/release.yaml | grep -A 10 -B 10 "Create PR for Documentation"

# Let's also check if there are any other files that might be handling documentation updates
rg -l "documentation" --type yaml
rg -l "README.md" --type yaml

# Check if there are any active workflows that modify or commit files
rg "git (add|commit|push)" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 376

Comment on lines 16 to 26
echo "Configuring Git safe directory: ${WORKSPACE_DIR}"
if ! git config --global --add safe.directory "${WORKSPACE_DIR}"; then
echo "Failed to configure Git safe directory. Ensure Git is installed and you have proper permissions."
exit 1
fi

cd "${WORKSPACE_DIR}" || { echo "Failed to change directory to ${WORKSPACE_DIR}. Please verify the directory exists."; exit 1; }
if ! git config --global --add safe.directory "${WORKSPACE_DIR}"; then
echo "Failed to configure Git safe directory"
exit 1
fi
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove duplicate Git safe directory configuration.

The Git safe directory configuration is duplicated unnecessarily. The second block (lines 23-26) is redundant as it performs the exact same operation as the first block.

 echo "Configuring Git safe directory: ${WORKSPACE_DIR}"
 if ! git config --global --add safe.directory "${WORKSPACE_DIR}"; then
     echo "Failed to configure Git safe directory. Ensure Git is installed and you have proper permissions."
     exit 1
 fi

 cd "${WORKSPACE_DIR}" || { echo "Failed to change directory to ${WORKSPACE_DIR}. Please verify the directory exists."; exit 1; }
-if ! git config --global --add safe.directory "${WORKSPACE_DIR}"; then
-    echo "Failed to configure Git safe directory"
-    exit 1
-fi
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
echo "Configuring Git safe directory: ${WORKSPACE_DIR}"
if ! git config --global --add safe.directory "${WORKSPACE_DIR}"; then
echo "Failed to configure Git safe directory. Ensure Git is installed and you have proper permissions."
exit 1
fi
cd "${WORKSPACE_DIR}" || { echo "Failed to change directory to ${WORKSPACE_DIR}. Please verify the directory exists."; exit 1; }
if ! git config --global --add safe.directory "${WORKSPACE_DIR}"; then
echo "Failed to configure Git safe directory"
exit 1
fi
echo "Configuring Git safe directory: ${WORKSPACE_DIR}"
if ! git config --global --add safe.directory "${WORKSPACE_DIR}"; then
echo "Failed to configure Git safe directory. Ensure Git is installed and you have proper permissions."
exit 1
fi
cd "${WORKSPACE_DIR}" || { echo "Failed to change directory to ${WORKSPACE_DIR}. Please verify the directory exists."; exit 1; }

Comment on lines 103 to 108
# Install Git LFS
echo "Installing Git LFS..."
if ! curl -s https://packagecloud.io/install/repositories/github/git-lfs/script.deb.sh | sudo bash; then
echo "Failed to add Git LFS repository"
exit 1
fi
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Enhance security for Git LFS installation.

Executing scripts directly from URLs poses security risks. Consider:

  1. Verifying the script's checksum before execution
  2. Using the package manager's native Git LFS package instead
-# Install Git LFS
-echo "Installing Git LFS..."
-if ! curl -s https://packagecloud.io/install/repositories/github/git-lfs/script.deb.sh | sudo bash; then
-  echo "Failed to add Git LFS repository"
-  exit 1
-fi
+# Install Git LFS using package manager
+echo "Installing Git LFS..."
+if ! sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y git-lfs; then
+  echo "Failed to install Git LFS"
+  exit 1
+fi
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# Install Git LFS
echo "Installing Git LFS..."
if ! curl -s https://packagecloud.io/install/repositories/github/git-lfs/script.deb.sh | sudo bash; then
echo "Failed to add Git LFS repository"
exit 1
fi
# Install Git LFS using package manager
echo "Installing Git LFS..."
if ! sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y git-lfs; then
echo "Failed to install Git LFS"
exit 1
fi


- Workspace: ${WORKSPACE_DIR}
- Allure: $(allure --version)
- Pre-commit: $(pre-commit --version)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add missing pre-commit installation.

The summary displays pre-commit version (pre-commit --version), but the installation of pre-commit is not visible in the script.

Add the following before the summary section:

+# Install pre-commit
+echo "Installing pre-commit..."
+if ! pip install pre-commit; then
+    echo "Failed to install pre-commit"
+    exit 1
+fi
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- Pre-commit: $(pre-commit --version)
# Install pre-commit
echo "Installing pre-commit..."
if ! pip install pre-commit; then
echo "Failed to install pre-commit"
exit 1
fi
- Pre-commit: $(pre-commit --version)

Comment on lines +69 to +86
install_component() {
local component="$1"
local command="$2"

# Input validation
if [[ -z "${component}" || -z "${command}" ]]; then
echo "Error: Component name and command are required"
exit 1
fi

echo "Installing ${component}..."
# shellcheck disable=SC2068
if ! ${command[@]}; then
echo "Failed to install ${component}"
exit 1
fi
}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve component installation error handling and array usage.

The install_component function has a few areas for improvement:

  1. Using exit within a function makes it non-reusable and harder to handle errors at the caller level
  2. The shellcheck disable for SC2068 suggests improper array handling
 install_component() {
     local component="$1"
     local command="$2"
+    local status=0

     # Input validation
     if [[ -z "${component}" || -z "${command}" ]]; then
         echo "Error: Component name and command are required"
-        exit 1
+        return 1
     fi

     echo "Installing ${component}..."
-    # shellcheck disable=SC2068
-    if ! ${command[@]}; then
+    if ! eval "${command}"; then
       echo "Failed to install ${component}"
-      exit 1
+      return 1
     fi
+    return 0
 }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +49 to +50
"streetsidesoftware.code-spell-checker",
"streetsidesoftware.code-spell-checker",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove duplicate extension entry

The extension streetsidesoftware.code-spell-checker is listed twice in the extensions array.

-				"streetsidesoftware.code-spell-checker",
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
"streetsidesoftware.code-spell-checker",
"streetsidesoftware.code-spell-checker",
"streetsidesoftware.code-spell-checker",

Comment on lines +14 to +20
"ghcr.io/partcad/devcontainers-features/apt:2": {
"packages": "bash-completion shellcheck mc python3-pip python3-venv" // shfmt
},
"ghcr.io/partcad/devcontainers-features/pip:2": {
"packages": "pre-commit mkdocs mkdocs-material",
"location": "/opt/pip"
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider version pinning for pip packages

The pip feature installs packages without version constraints. This could lead to compatibility issues if package versions change.

-			"packages": "pre-commit mkdocs mkdocs-material",
+			"packages": "pre-commit==3.5.0 mkdocs==1.5.3 mkdocs-material==9.4.14",
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
"ghcr.io/partcad/devcontainers-features/apt:2": {
"packages": "bash-completion shellcheck mc python3-pip python3-venv" // shfmt
},
"ghcr.io/partcad/devcontainers-features/pip:2": {
"packages": "pre-commit mkdocs mkdocs-material",
"location": "/opt/pip"
}
"ghcr.io/partcad/devcontainers-features/apt:2": {
"packages": "bash-completion shellcheck mc python3-pip python3-venv" // shfmt
},
"ghcr.io/partcad/devcontainers-features/pip:2": {
"packages": "pre-commit==3.5.0 mkdocs==1.5.3 mkdocs-material==9.4.14",
"location": "/opt/pip"
}

Comment on lines +52 to +53
# TODO: alexanderilyin: check that it is set
USER_EMAIL=$(git config user.email)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove TODO comment and implement the check

The TODO comment suggests checking if the email is set, but the check is already implemented below.

-# TODO: alexanderilyin: check that it is set
 USER_EMAIL=$(git config user.email)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# TODO: alexanderilyin: check that it is set
USER_EMAIL=$(git config user.email)
USER_EMAIL=$(git config user.email)

Comment on lines +74 to +76
if ! grep -q "$USER_EMAIL" "$SIGNERS_FILE"; then
echo "$USER_EMAIL $SELECTED_FP" >> "$SIGNERS_FILE"
fi
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add validation for existing key entries

The script appends new entries without checking if the same key (not just email) already exists, which could lead to duplicate keys with different emails.

-    if ! grep -q "$USER_EMAIL" "$SIGNERS_FILE"; then
+    if ! grep -q "^$USER_EMAIL $SELECTED_FP$" "$SIGNERS_FILE"; then
         echo "$USER_EMAIL $SELECTED_FP" >> "$SIGNERS_FILE"
     fi
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if ! grep -q "$USER_EMAIL" "$SIGNERS_FILE"; then
echo "$USER_EMAIL $SELECTED_FP" >> "$SIGNERS_FILE"
fi
if ! grep -q "^$USER_EMAIL $SELECTED_FP$" "$SIGNERS_FILE"; then
echo "$USER_EMAIL $SELECTED_FP" >> "$SIGNERS_FILE"
fi

"version": "3.10"
},
"ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/conda:1": {
"version": "24.5.0" // GH has 24.11.1
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Address TODO comments with concrete actions

There are two TODO comments that should be addressed:

  1. Conda version mismatch note
  2. Moving postCreateCommand to Dockerfile

For the Conda version:

-		"version": "24.5.0" // GH has 24.11.1
+		"version": "24.11.1"

For the postCreateCommand, create a new issue to track the optimization task.

Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track moving the bootstrap command to the Dockerfile?

Also applies to: 41-41

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant