Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Individual area #15

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 7, 2022
Merged

Individual area #15

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 7, 2022

Conversation

ekr
Copy link
Contributor

@ekr ekr commented Apr 7, 2022

Here is an alternate proposal that just creates an individual space, with both addition and removal at the discretion of the chairs. I changed this from consensus to remove because it seems weird to have the chairs have discretion to adopt but not to remove and the primary reason for removal will be if it's just clearly out of scope.

I see that I've also removed the proposed principles for adoption. Those seem potentially reasonable but belong in another PR.

charter.html Outdated
href=https://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/cla/>W3C Community
Contributor License Agreement (CLA)</a>. The proposal should also have a notice
on the `README.md` file at its base or on the document itself which clearly
states "This document is an individual draft proposal. It and does not represent a work item of the Private Advertising Technology
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. I'm not sure how the second sentence is supposed to be structured ("It and does not"). 2) Not sure why we're mentioning the (TBC) PATWG? 3) Is "work item" defined somewhere? I'm not opposed to saying it's not one, just perhaps you really mean "this proposal has not been officially adopted by the PATCG" or something.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. I believe the WG thing was part of the original PR and then I mis-edited. I adopted your suggested text.

@npdoty
Copy link
Contributor

npdoty commented Apr 7, 2022

Would we open issues for every individual draft in the same repo? Maybe just using a prefix in the issue title, or labels for an issue, so that we can filter issues to a particular individual draft.

charter.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@gmail.com>
@ekr
Copy link
Contributor Author

ekr commented Apr 7, 2022

Would we open issues for every individual draft in the same repo? Maybe just using a prefix in the issue title, or labels for an issue, so that we can filter issues to a particular individual draft.

This will be one draft per repo.

Copy link

@cwilso cwilso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@AramZS AramZS merged commit 6337450 into patcg:main Apr 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants