♻️ Use Interface Events #248
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Pascal Marco Caversaccio <pascal.caversaccio@hotmail.ch>
Signed-off-by: Pascal Marco Caversaccio <pascal.caversaccio@hotmail.ch>
Signed-off-by: Pascal Marco Caversaccio <pascal.caversaccio@hotmail.ch>
pcaversaccio
added
the
optimisation ⚡️
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🕓 Changelog
Using directly interface events leads to a cleaner code structure, i.e. they do not have to be redefined in a module contract. In addition, we adjust the upper bound for the batch calls in the
erc1155contract to128(and anuint8type), reduce the upper bound for the return value ofeip712Domainto32, and implement aconstantparameter_DYNARRAY_BOUNDfor the dynamic arrays in themerkle_proof_verificationcontract.🐶 Cute Animal Picture