Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Fix the bug that pdm plugins are invalid on ubuntu(#3289) #3293

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

monchin
Copy link
Contributor

@monchin monchin commented Nov 15, 2024

Pull Request Checklist

  • A news fragment is added in news/ describing what is new.
  • Test cases added for changed code.

Describe what you have changed in this PR.

fix #3289

@monchin monchin changed the title fix: Fix the bug that pdm plugins are invalid on ubuntu fix: Fix the bug that pdm plugins are invalid on ubuntu(#3289) Nov 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.33%. Comparing base (d1dc03d) to head (ef4a868).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3293      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.33%   85.33%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         112      112              
  Lines       11402    11407       +5     
  Branches     2487     2489       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         9730     9734       +4     
- Misses       1143     1144       +1     
  Partials      529      529              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 85.11% <66.66%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@monchin
Copy link
Contributor Author

monchin commented Nov 15, 2024

I need to know why the original code is

if sys.platform == "darwin" and "osx_framework_library" in scheme_names:

Are there macos computers without "osx_framework_library" in scheme_names? Is my code correct on all mainstream systems?

@o-moe
Copy link
Contributor

o-moe commented Nov 15, 2024

Are there macos computers without "osx_framework_library" in scheme_names? Is my code correct on all mainstream systems?

Yes, the built-in Python that comes with recent macOS, report

'nt', 'nt_user', 'osx_framework_user', 'posix_home', 'posix_prefix', 'posix_user'

Python from brew also reports osx_framework_library

If Python reports osx_framework_library on macOS is depending on how it is built. This will dictate where it is installed to and what osx functionalities it can access.

@o-moe
Copy link
Contributor

o-moe commented Nov 15, 2024

If you want to be 100% backwards compatible regarding darwin and just add linux to the mix, this could be an alternative:

if ((sys.platform == "darwin" and "osx_framework_library" in scheme_names) or sys.platform == "linux") and kind == "prefix":

Basically that's similar to one of the statements from your issue

@monchin
Copy link
Contributor Author

monchin commented Nov 17, 2024

Basically that's similar to one of the statements from your issue

That's the very first code I thought which should be. But consider here

# tag 2.20.1 src/pdm/core.py #L314
    def _add_project_plugins_library(self) -> None:
        ...
        scheme = "nt" if os.name == "nt" else "posix_prefix"
        purelib = sysconfig.get_path("purelib", scheme, replace_vars)
        scripts = sysconfig.get_path("scripts", scheme, replace_vars)

If os.name != nt, then all scheme would be "posix_prefix". That's the reason why this bug occurs on ubuntu. I'm trying to ensure the consistency here and the installation route.

Or maybe there is another way better,

    def _add_project_plugins_library(self) -> None:
        ...
        scheme_names = sysconfig.get_scheme_names()
        if os.name == "nt":
            scheme = "nt"
        elif sys.platform == "darwin" and "osx_framework_library" in scheme_names:
            scheme = "posix_prefix"
        else:
            scheme = sysconfig.get_default_scheme()
        purelib = sysconfig.get_path("purelib", scheme, replace_vars)
        scripts = sysconfig.get_path("scripts", scheme, replace_vars)

That would be exactly 100% backwards compatible, and could ensure the consistency of loading path and installation path

@monchin
Copy link
Contributor Author

monchin commented Nov 17, 2024

So strange. I just found this bug occurs because ubuntu /usr/lib/python<version>/sysconfig.py's code is different with the code on github. On github code, there is no "posix_local", and get_default_scheme() should get "posix_prefix" on ubuntu as the code says

def _get_preferred_schemes():
    if os.name == 'nt':
        return {
            'prefix': 'nt',
            'home': 'posix_home',
            'user': 'nt_user',
        }
    if sys.platform == 'darwin' and sys._framework:
        return {
            'prefix': 'posix_prefix',
            'home': 'posix_home',
            'user': 'osx_framework_user',
        }
    return {
        'prefix': 'posix_prefix',
        'home': 'posix_home',
        'user': 'posix_user',
    }

while both on my wsl2 (ubuntu 24.04, python 3.12.3) and the server in my company (ubuntu 22.04, python 3.10.12), the code is

def _get_preferred_schemes():
    if os.name == 'nt':
        return {
            'prefix': 'nt',
            'home': 'posix_home',
            'user': 'nt_user',
        }
    if sys.platform == 'darwin' and sys._framework:
        return {
            'prefix': 'posix_prefix',
            'home': 'posix_home',
            'user': 'osx_framework_user',
        }

    if sys.base_prefix != sys.prefix or hasattr(sys, "real_prefix"):
        # virtual environments
        prefix_scheme = 'posix_prefix'
    else:
        # default to /usr for package builds, /usr/local otherwise
        deb_build = os.environ.get('DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_LAYOUT', 'posix_local')
        if deb_build in ('deb', 'deb_system'):
            prefix_scheme = 'deb_system'
        else:
            prefix_scheme = 'posix_local'

    return {
        'prefix': prefix_scheme,
        'home': 'posix_home',
        'user': 'posix_user',
    }

I don't know why it's not the code on github. Anyway we need to fix it

@o-moe
Copy link
Contributor

o-moe commented Nov 17, 2024

I don't think that this difference is a bug. Even though Ubuntu's (Debian's) Python reports as cPython, Debian patches it to better fit their distribution. There's a whole repository to track such changes: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team

Here's a thread regading changing the local installation path starting with Python 3.10 (which is part of the sysconfig patch): https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2022/03/msg00039.html

@monchin
Copy link
Contributor Author

monchin commented Nov 17, 2024

I don't think that this difference is a bug.

I never regard this difference as a bug, and there's no way for us to change the code for debian team. Maybe I said "Anyway we need to fix it" misleads you, but what I mean is we need to fix the bug that results from this difference.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[bug] ubuntu plugins not valid after installation
2 participants