Register new File Browser in tools registry #880
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jecisc
reviewed
Nov 7, 2024
Ducasse
reviewed
Nov 10, 2024
jecisc
added a commit
to jecisc/NewTools
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2024
Alternative to pharo-spec#880 I'm not putting this in the post load of the baseline because if we load a group of the baseline we do not know if the file browser will be loaded or not. Pharo seems to load a subgroup of NewTools first and the file list is not in this subgroup.
|
Closing in favor of: #885 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Register the new file browser in the tools registry after Baseline load.