We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In raising this issue, I confirm the following (please check boxes, eg [X] - no spaces) Failure to fill the template will close your issue:
How familiar are you with the codebase?:
1
[BUG | ISSUE] Expected Behaviour: non-breaking space between temperature value (eg 90) and units (eg °F), read 90 °F, following http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section5-3-3.html
[BUG | ISSUE] Actual Behaviour: No space. 90°F
[BUG | ISSUE] Steps to reproduce:
Scientist here, sorry about the OCD, just caught my eye. Should be a quick and pain-free fix!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
non-breaking space between temperature value (eg 90) and units (eg °F), read 90 °F, following ...
i.e. 25 °C
25 °C
why didn't you propose that in #429 but use an ordinary whitespace there?
Sorry, something went wrong.
I've updated the code to have a non-breaking space instead of single whitespace
No branches or pull requests
In raising this issue, I confirm the following (please check boxes, eg [X] - no spaces) Failure to fill the template will close your issue:
How familiar are you with the codebase?:
1
[BUG | ISSUE] Expected Behaviour:
non-breaking space between temperature value (eg 90) and units (eg °F), read 90 °F, following http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section5-3-3.html
[BUG | ISSUE] Actual Behaviour:
No space. 90°F
[BUG | ISSUE] Steps to reproduce:
Scientist here, sorry about the OCD, just caught my eye. Should be a quick and pain-free fix!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: