Made a handful of changes and a couple of bug fixes

[majorcode]

Hello. First I want to thank you for for this library. Especially for the update that moves the guiders on browser resize. That change landed as I was about to write it myself.

This is my first open source commit. I had been working for the federal government, in isolation, for 12 years. Please go easy on me. Also, I apologize for letting so many changes pool up. I'm a recent convert from Subversion. And this is the fist chance I've had to contribute code back to you.

I carefully made comments for each of the 10 commits. But the complete, unified diff of all commits doesn't really tell the story as I intended. Should these have been 10 separate pull requests?

I look forward to hearing your feedback.

[pickhardt]

Thanks Steve. They should have been logically separate pull requests,
probably not 10 but not 1 either. It's not that big a deal though.

When I get some time I intend to look through all the pull requests
including this and merge a bunch in.

Why did you rename dehighlightElement to removeHighlight?

Jeff Pickhardt
pickhardt@gmail.com

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Steve Farmer notifications@git.luolix.topwrote:

Hello. First I want to thank you for for this library. Especially for the
update that moves the guiders on browser resize. That change landed as I
was about to write it myself.

This is my first open source commit. I had been working for the federal
government, in isolation, for 12 years. Please go easy on me. Also, I
apologize for letting so many changes pool up. I'm a recent convert from
Subversion. And this is the fist chance I've had to contribute code back to
you.

I carefully made comments for each of the 10 commits. But the complete,
unified diff of all commits doesn't really tell the story as I intended.
Should these have been 10 separate pull requests?

I look forward to hearing your feedback.

You can merge this Pull Request by running

git pull https://github.com/majorcode/Guiders-JS dev

Or view, comment on, or merge it at:

#116
Commit Summary

• Version 2.0.0 / Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/dev'
• Version 2.0.0 / Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/dev'
• move component.json to bower.json
• Merge pull request rename component.json to bower.json #111 from aub/master
• Reduce places where the _guiders array is accessed directly by
  calling get() or getCurrentGuider() to find guiders.
• If next() is called on a guider that should be skipped, the return
  value from next() should be the result from the recursive call to next().
• Use a counter instead of a random number to automatically assign
  guider IDs.
• Check for myGuider === null in _attach since typeof null is 'object'.
• When adding a guider after another and setting its prev ID,
  reciprocate by setting the previous guider's next ID.
• Add events to observe guider prev/next navigation.
• Since we de-highlight guider.highlight, we should be highlighting it
  instead of guider.attachTo.
• Reset _currentGuiderID to null when all guiders are hidden.
• Replace _dehighlightElement() with _removeHighlight() and call it in
  key places.
• Add descriptions for guider options that were not listed in the doc.

File Changes

• M README.mdhttps://github.com/Made a handful of changes and a couple of bug fixes #116/files#diff-0(4)
• R bower.jsonhttps://github.com/Made a handful of changes and a couple of bug fixes #116/files#diff-1(0)
• M guiders.jshttps://github.com/Made a handful of changes and a couple of bug fixes #116/files#diff-2(68)

Patch Links:

• https://github.com/jeff-optimizely/Guiders-JS/pull/116.patch
• https://github.com/jeff-optimizely/Guiders-JS/pull/116.diff

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/116
.

[majorcode]

Hi, Jeff,

About deHighlightElement: In db7545c I rearranged places where the highlight was removed to be sure to cover some other cases. I realized that the most defensive thing to do was remove the highlight from anything with that class. So I thought a new name was best. And, since this is in internal function, the API remains unchanged.

Steve